Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

document current semantics of rfc/@docName and rfc/@format #122

Closed
reschke opened this issue Apr 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

document current semantics of rfc/@docName and rfc/@format #122

reschke opened this issue Apr 13, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Apr 13, 2020

(this is a first step towards the proposed resolution in https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-10.html#section-3.1.21.5)
interim-rfc-series-project-manager added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 16, 2020
@interim-rfc-series-project-manager
Merge pull request #123 from reschke/i122
59406eb 
Restore metadata attributes on rfc element (#122)
@reschke reschke closed this as completed Apr 17, 2020
@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Apr 21, 2020 •
edited

so here's the caveat: see https://gist.github.com/reschke/e1750b3a224528bf0eab1e4526efea84

xml2rfc uses seriesInfo for the BCP number, not the seriesInfo attribute; so it's inconsistent in where it takes information from (the RFC number is taken from the number attribute).

I don't think it makes sense to document this inconsistency; it would be better to either fix it, or directly proceed with removing <seriesInfo> from the <front> element.

What do you think, @levkowetz ?

@jrlevine jrlevine mentioned this issue Feb 27, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@reschke