Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deprecation of xref/@format='none' is bogus #17

Closed
reschke opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

deprecation of xref/@format='none' is bogus #17

reschke opened this issue Mar 22, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Mar 22, 2017

'none' covers the use case where semantically text refers to a <reference>, but the generated text shouldn't show that.

For instance, it is very common to talk in prose about "RFC xxxx", and it's good if the XML source can express, that semantically this is indeed a reference, even if not styled that way. Example: first sentence of https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7990.html#rfc.section.3 - written by the RSE.

Technically, it's also helpful, as it keeps track of which references are actually used, and vice, versa, will cause an error if the reference target for some reason is removed from <references>.

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Mar 22, 2017

Also, citing https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7991.html#rfc.section.1.3.3

Deprecate the "none" values for the "format" attribute in because it makes no sense semantically.

Even if that was true, that reasoning is bogus as we have lots of language features that "make no sense semantically".

@hildjj
Copy link
Collaborator

hildjj commented Mar 28, 2017

@paulehoffman

reschke added a commit to reschke/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2020
interim-rfc-series-project-manager added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2020
un-deprecate <xref>'s format="none" (#17)
@reschke reschke closed this as completed Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants