also swap Int64 literals on 32-bits systems #4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rfourquet
force-pushed
the
int64-literals
branch
6 times, most recently
from
d53b802 to
715a138
Compare
rfourquet
force-pushed
the
master
branch
5 times, most recently
from
ff4cd06 to
f8d8c22
Compare
rfourquet
force-pushed
the
int64-literals
branch
from
73209ce to
151a4f7
Compare
rfourquet
changed the title
rfourquet
force-pushed
the
int64-literals
branch
from
151a4f7 to
99c25ef
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cf. https://discourse.julialang.org/t/whats-the-accepted-way-to-ensure-same-integer-behavior-between-32-bit-and-64-bit-julia/49564.