A response to Miller and Ulrich's "Interpreting Confidence intervals: A comment on Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014)"
TeX
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
figure
.gitignore
HoekstraEtAl2014.data.csv
README.md
lab.bib
response.Rnw
response.pdf

README.md

Miller and Ulrich Response

The second draft of a response to Miller and Ulrich's "Interpreting Confidence intervals: A comment on Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014)" (Miller and Ulrich is, as of July 2015, in press in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review).

DOI for citing version 0.2: DOI

Guide to the data set

This repository now includes the data set from Hoekstra, Morey, Rouder, and Wagenmakers (2014), as HoekstraEtAl2014.data.csv. A brief description of the columns in the data follows. For all columns, NA indicates a missing response.

Column(s) Possible values Description
Q1 - Q6 0, 1, NA Did the survey respondent endorse the item (1) or not (0)?
expertise Numeric value between 1 and 10, inclusive, or NA Self-rated statistical expertise (see paper for details)
group string variable Group the survey respondent was a part of (see paper for details)
Nendorsed Integers between 0 and 6, inclusive, or NA Total number of statements endorsed; sum of first six columns