Hi,
I'm currently comparing the results from DROID and Siegfried (through Brunnhilde). In a dataset containing 216420 files, there are only 2537 discrepancies between the two (roughly 1%), which imho is not bad. However, in my test at least 50% of these discrepancies are due to Siegfried apparently skipping a file. A comparison of the outputs by roy yields "missing" from the siegfried CSV (confirmed by manually checking the Siegfried CSV: they aren't there, so no mistake by roy). I redid the Brunnhilde analysis several times and each time the same files were skipped. I analysed a few of these files (TIFF's in this case) with other programs (JHOVE, DPF Manager) and there seemed to be nothing wrong with them. I also checked whether it might be due to long paths/filenames, non-standard characters in the filename, too many files in a directory or extremely large files, but none of these things seemed a problem. This was confirmed by an individual analysis of each file with Siegfried: the files were correctly analysed. But when I tried to analyse the directory directly with Siegfried, the same files were skipped again. I have no idea why, but I can provide you with the files and the different analyses if you need them.
Kind regards,
Maarten
Hi,
I'm currently comparing the results from DROID and Siegfried (through Brunnhilde). In a dataset containing 216420 files, there are only 2537 discrepancies between the two (roughly 1%), which imho is not bad. However, in my test at least 50% of these discrepancies are due to Siegfried apparently skipping a file. A comparison of the outputs by roy yields "missing" from the siegfried CSV (confirmed by manually checking the Siegfried CSV: they aren't there, so no mistake by roy). I redid the Brunnhilde analysis several times and each time the same files were skipped. I analysed a few of these files (TIFF's in this case) with other programs (JHOVE, DPF Manager) and there seemed to be nothing wrong with them. I also checked whether it might be due to long paths/filenames, non-standard characters in the filename, too many files in a directory or extremely large files, but none of these things seemed a problem. This was confirmed by an individual analysis of each file with Siegfried: the files were correctly analysed. But when I tried to analyse the directory directly with Siegfried, the same files were skipped again. I have no idea why, but I can provide you with the files and the different analyses if you need them.
Kind regards,
Maarten