Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) metric and Berkeley-Adobe Perceptual Patch Similarity (BAPPS) dataset
Python Shell
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Latest commit bfc3928 Jan 15, 2018 @richzhang richzhang Update README.md
Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
data initial commit Jan 11, 2018
imgs initial commit Jan 11, 2018
models initial commit Jan 11, 2018
scripts initial commit Jan 11, 2018
util initial commit Jan 11, 2018
weights initial commit Jan 11, 2018
README.md Update README.md Jan 15, 2018
test_dataset_model.py initial commit Jan 11, 2018
test_network.py initial commit Jan 11, 2018

README.md

Perceptual Similarity Metric and Dataset [Project Page]

This repository contains the (1) Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) metric and (2) Berkeley-Adobe Perceptual Patch Similarity (BAPPS) dataset proposed in the following paper:

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Networks as a Perceptual Metric
Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, Eli Shechtman, Oliver Wang.
In ArXiv, 2018.

(0) Dependencies

This repository uses Python 2 or 3, with the following libraries: PyTorch, numpy, scipy, skimage.

(1) Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) metric

About the metric

We found that deep network activations work surprisingly well as a perceptual similarity metric. This was true across network architectures (SqueezeNet [2.8 MB], AlexNet [9.1 MB], and VGG [58.9 MB] provided similar scores) and supervisory signals (unsupervised, self-supervised, and supervised all perform strongly). We slightly improved scores by linearly "calibrating" networks - adding a linear layer on top of off-the-shelf classification networks. We provide 3 variants, using linear layers on top of the SqueezeNet, AlexNet (default), and VGG networks. Using this code, you can simply call model.forward(im0,im1) to evaluate the distance between two image patches.

Using the metric

File test_network.py contains example usage. Running test_network.py will take the distance between example reference image ex_ref.png to distorted images ex_p0.png and ex_p1.png. Before running it - which do you think should be closer?

Load a model with the following commands.

from models import dist_model as dm
model = dm.DistModel()
model.initialize(model='net-lin',net='alex',use_gpu=True)

Variable net can be squeeze, alex, vgg. Network alex is fastest and performs the best (not specifying the net will default to alex). Set model=net for an uncalibrated off-the-shelf network (taking cos distance).

To call the model, run model.forward(im0,im1), where im0, im1 are PyTorch tensors with shape python Nx3xHxW (N patches of size HxW, RGB images scaled in [-1,+1]).

(2) Berkeley Adobe Perceptual Patch Similarity (BAPPS) dataset

Downloading the dataset

Run bash ./scripts/get_dataset.sh to download and unzip the dataset. Dataset will appear in directory ./dataset. Dataset takes [6.6 GB] total.

  • 2AFC train [5.3 GB]
  • 2AFC val [1.1 GB]
  • JND val [0.2 GB]
    Alternatively, run bash ./scripts/get_dataset_valonly.sh to only download the validation set (no training set).

Evaluating a perceptual similarity metric on a dataset

Script test_dataset_model.py evaluates a perceptual model on a subset of the dataset.

Dataset flags

  • dataset_mode: 2afc or jnd, which type of perceptual judgment to evaluate
  • datasets: list the datasets to evaluate
    • if dataset_mode was 2afc, choices are [train/traditional, train/cnn, val/traditional, val/cnn, val/superres, val/deblur, val/color, val/frameinterp]
    • if dataset_mode was jnd, choices are [val/traditional, val/cnn]

Perceptual pimilarity model flags

  • model: perceptual similarity model to use
    • net-lin for our LPIPS learned similarity model (linear network on top of internal activations of pretrained network)
    • net for a classification network (uncalibrated with all layers averaged)
    • l2 for Euclidean distance
    • ssim for Structured Similarity Image Metric
  • net: choices are [squeeze,alex,vgg] for the net-lin and net models (ignored for l2 and ssim models)
  • colorspace: choices are [Lab,RGB], used for the l2 and ssim models (ignored for net-lin and net models)

Misc flags

  • batch_size: evaluation batch size (will default to 1 )
  • --use_gpu: turn on this flag for GPU usage

An example usage is as follows: python ./test_dataset_model.py --dataset_mode 2afc --datasets val/traditional val/cnn --model net-lin --net alex --use_gpu --batch_size 50. This would evaluate our model on the "traditional" and "cnn" validation datasets.

About the dataset

The dataset contains two types of perceptual judgements: Two Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Just Noticeable Differences (JND).

(1) Two Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) - Data is contained in the 2afc subdirectory. Evaluators were given a reference patch, along with two distorted patches, and were asked to select which of the distorted patches was "closer" to the reference patch.

Training sets contain 2 human judgments/triplet.

  • train/traditional [56.6k triplets]
  • train/cnn [38.1k triplets]
  • train/mix [56.6k triplets]

Validation sets contain 5 judgments/triplet.

  • val/traditional [4.7k triplets]
  • val/cnn [4.7k triplets]
  • val/superres [10.9k triplets]
  • val/deblur [9.4k triplets]
  • val/color [4.7k triplets]
  • val/frameinterp [1.9k triplets]

Each 2AFC subdirectory contains the following folders:

  • ref contains the original reference patches
  • p0,p1 contain the two distorted patches
  • judge contains what the human evaluators chose - 0 if all humans preferred p0, 1 if all humans preferred p1

(2) Just Noticeable Differences (JND) - Data is contained in the jnd subdirectory. Evaluators were presented with two patches - a reference patch and a distorted patch - for a limited time, and were asked if they thought the patches were the same (identically) or difference.

Each set contains 3 human evaluations/example.

  • val/traditional [4.8k patch pairs]
  • val/cnn [4.8k patch pairs]

Each JND subdirectory contains the following folders:

  • p0,p1 contain the two patches
  • same contains fraction of human evaluators who thought the patches were the same (0 if all humans thought patches were different, 1 if all humans thought patches were the same)

Acknowledgements

This repository borrows partially from the pytorch-CycleGAN-and-pix2pix repository.