Skip to content
Permalink
master
Switch branches/tags
Go to file
 
 
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time

The Execute Pipeline

The Execution Pipeline covers the execution and write-back of :term:`Micro-Ops (UOPs)<Micro-Op (UOP)>`. Although the :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` will travel down the pipeline one after the other (in the order they have been issued), the :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` themselves are likely to have been issued to the Execution Pipeline out-of-order. :numref:`dual-issue-pipeline` shows an example Execution Pipeline for a dual-issue BOOM.

Execution Units

Example :term:`Execution Unit`

An example :term:`Execution Unit`. This particular example shows an integer ALU (that can bypass results to dependent instructions) and an unpipelined divider that becomes busy during operation. Both :term:`Functional Unit`s share a single write-port. The :term:`Execution Unit` accepts both kill signals and branch resolution signals and passes them to the internal :term:`Functional Unit` s as required.

An :term:`Execution Unit` is a module that a single issue port will schedule :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` onto and contains some mix of :term:`Functional Unit` s. Phrased in another way, each issue port from the Issue Queue talks to one and only one :term:`Execution Unit`. An :term:`Execution Unit` may contain just a single simple integer ALU, or it could contain a full complement of floating point units, a integer ALU, and an integer multiply unit.

The purpose of the :term:`Execution Unit` is to provide a flexible abstraction which gives a lot of control over what kind of :term:`Execution Unit` s the architect can add to their pipeline

Scheduling Readiness

An :term:`Execution Unit` provides a bit-vector of the :term:`Functional Unit` s it has available to the issue scheduler. The issue scheduler will only schedule :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` that the :term:`Execution Unit` supports. For :term:`Functional Unit` s that may not always be ready (e.g., an un-pipelined divider), the appropriate bit in the bit-vector will be disabled (See :numref:`dual-issue-pipeline`).

Functional Unit

Abstract :term:`Functional Unit`

The abstract Pipelined :term:`Functional Unit` class. An expert-written, low-level :term:`Functional Unit` is instantiated within the :term:`Functional Unit`. The request and response ports are abstracted and bypass and branch speculation support is provided. :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` are individually killed by gating off their response as they exit the low-level :term:`Functional Unit` .

:term:`Functional Unit` s are the muscle of the CPU, computing the necessary operations as required by the instructions. :term:`Functional Unit` s typically require a knowledgable domain expert to implement them correctly and efficiently.

For this reason, BOOM uses an abstract :term:`Functional Unit` class to "wrap" expert-written, low-level :term:`Functional Unit` s from the Rocket repository (see :ref:`Rocket Chip SoC Generator`). However, the expert-written :term:`Functional Unit` s created for the Rocket in-order processor make assumptions about in-order issue and commit points (namely, that once an instruction has been dispatched to them it will never need to be killed). These assumptions break down for BOOM.

However, instead of re-writing or forking the :term:`Functional Unit` s, BOOM provides an abstract :term:`Functional Unit` class (see :numref:`abstract-fu`) that “wraps" the lower-level functional units with the parameterized auto-generated support code needed to make them work within BOOM. The request and response ports are abstracted, allowing :term:`Functional Unit` s to provide a unified, interchangeable interface.

Pipelined Functional Units

A pipelined :term:`Functional Unit` can accept a new :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` every cycle. Each :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` will take a known, fixed latency.

Speculation support is provided by auto-generating a pipeline that passes down the :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` meta-data and branch mask in parallel with the :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` within the expert-written :term:`Functional Unit` . If a :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` is misspeculated, it’s response is de-asserted as it exits the functional unit.

An example pipelined :term:`Functional Unit` is shown in :numref:`abstract-fu`.

Un-pipelined Functional Units

Un-pipelined :term:`Functional Unit` s (e.g., a divider) take an variable (and unknown) number of cycles to complete a single operation. Once occupied, they de-assert their ready signal and no additional :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` may be scheduled to them.

Speculation support is provided by tracking the branch mask of the :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` in the :term:`Functional Unit`.

The only requirement of the expert-written un-pipelined :term:`Functional Unit` is to provide a kill signal to quickly remove misspeculated :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)`. [1]

Functional Unit Hierarchy

The dashed ovals are the low-level :term:`Functional Unit` s written by experts, the squares are concrete classes that instantiate the low-level :term:`Functional Unit` s, and the octagons are abstract classes that provide generic speculation support and interfacing with the BOOM pipeline. The floating point divide and squart-root unit doesn’t cleanly fit either the Pipelined nor Unpipelined abstract class, and so directly inherits from the FunctionalUnit super class.

Branch Unit & Branch Speculation

The :term:`Branch Unit` handles the resolution of all branch and jump instructions.

All :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` that are "inflight" in the pipeline (have an allocated ROB entry) are given a branch mask, where each bit in the branch mask corresponds to an un-executed, inflight branch that the :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` is speculated under. Each branch in Decode is allocated a branch tag, and all following :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` will have the corresponding bit in the branch mask set (until the branch is resolved by the :term:`Branch Unit`).

If the branches (or jumps) have been correctly speculated by the :term:`Front-end`, then the :term:`Branch Unit` s only action is to broadcast the corresponding branch tag to all inflight :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` that the branch has been resolved correctly. Each :term:`UOP<Micro-Op (UOP)` can then clear the corresponding bit in its branch mask, and that branch tag can then be allocated to a new branch in the Decode stage.

If a branch (or jump) is misspeculated, the :term:`Branch Unit` must redirect the PC to the correct target, kill the :term:`Front-end` and :term:`Fetch Buffer`, and broadcast the misspeculated branch tag so that all dependent, inflight :term:`UOPs<Micro-Op (UOP)` may be killed. The PC redirect signal goes out immediately, to decrease the misprediction penalty. However, the kill signal is delayed a cycle for critical path reasons.

The :term:`Front-end` must pass down the pipeline the appropriate branch speculation meta-data, so that the correct direction can be reconciled with the prediction. Jump Register instructions are evaluated by comparing the correct target with the PC of the next instruction in the ROB (if not available, then a misprediction is assumed). Jumps are evaluated and handled in the :term:`Front-end` (as their direction and target are both known once the instruction can be decoded).

BOOM (currently) only supports having one :term:`Branch Unit` .

Load/Store Unit

The Load/Store Unit (LSU) handles the execution of load, store, atomic, and fence operations.

BOOM (currently) only supports having one LSU (and thus can only send one load or store per cycle to memory). [2]

See :ref:`The Load/Store Unit (LSU)` for more details on the LSU.

Floating Point Units

Functional Unit for FPU

The class hierarchy of the FPU is shown. The expert-written code is contained within the hardfloat and rocket repositories. The "FPU" class instantiates the Rocket components, which itself is further wrapped by the abstract :term:`Functional Unit` classes (which provides the out-of-order speculation support).

The low-level floating point units used by BOOM come from the Rocket processor (https://github.com/chipsalliance/rocket-chip) and hardfloat (https://github.com/ucb-bar/berkeley-hardfloat) repositories. Figure :numref:`fp-fu` shows the class hierarchy of the FPU.

To make the scheduling of the write-port trivial, all of the pipelined FP units are padded to have the same latency. [3]

Floating Point Divide and Square-root Unit

BOOM fully supports floating point divide and square-root operations using a single FDiv/Sqrt (or fdiv for short). BOOM accomplishes this by instantiating a double-precision unit from the hardfloat repository. The unit comes with the following features/constraints:

  • expects 65-bit recoded double-precision inputs
  • provides a 65-bit recoded double-precision output
  • can execute a divide operation and a square-root operation simultaneously
  • operations are unpipelined and take an unknown, variable latency
  • provides an unstable FIFO interface

Single-precision operations have their operands upscaled to double-precision (and then the output downscaled). [4]

Although the unit is unpipelined, it does not fit cleanly into the Pipelined/Unpipelined abstraction used by the other :term:`Functional Unit` s (see :numref:`fu-hierarchy`). This is because the unit provides an unstable FIFO interface: although the unit may provide a ready signal on Cycle i, there is no guarantee that it will continue to be ready on Cycle i+1, even if no operations are enqueued. This proves to be a challenge, as the Issue Queue may attempt to issue an instruction but cannot be certain the unit will accept it once it reaches the unit on a later cycle.

The solution is to add extra buffering within the unit to hold instructions until they can be released directly into the unit. If the buffering of the unit fills up, back pressure can be safely applied to the Issue Queue. [5]

Parameterization

BOOM provides flexibility in specifying the issue width and the mix of :term:`Functional Unit` s in the execution pipeline. See src/main/scala/exu/execution-units.scala for a detailed view on how to instantiate the execution pipeline in BOOM.

Additional parameterization, regarding things like the latency of the FP units can be found within the configuration settings (src/main/common/config-mixins.scala).

Control/Status Register Instructions

A set of Control/Status Register (CSR) instructions allow the atomic read and write of the Control/Status Registers. These architectural registers are separate from the integer and floating registers, and include the cycle count, retired instruction count, status, exception PC, and exception vector registers (and many more!). Each CSR has its own required privilege levels to read and write to it and some have their own side-effects upon reading (or writing).

BOOM (currently) does not rename any of the CSRs, and in addition to the potential side-effects caused by reading or writing a CSR, BOOM will only execute a CSR instruction non-speculatively. [6] This is accomplished by marking the CSR instruction as a "unique" (or "serializing") instruction - the ROB must be empty before it may proceed to the Issue Queue (and no instruction may follow it until it has finished execution and been committed by the ROB). It is then issued by the Issue Queue, reads the appropriate operands from the Physical Register File, and is then sent to the CSRFile. [7] The CSR instruction executes in the CSRFile and then writes back data as required to the Physical Register File. The CSRFile may also emit a PC redirect and/or an exception as part of executing a CSR instruction (e.g., a syscall).

The Rocket Custom Co-Processor Interface (RoCC)

The RoCC interface accepts a RoCC command and up to two register inputs from the Control Processor’s scalar register file. The RoCC command is actually the entire RISC-V instruction fetched by the Control Processor (a "RoCC instruction"). Thus, each RoCC queue entry is at least 2\*XPRLEN + 32 bits in size (additional RoCC instructions may use the longer instruction formats to encode additional behaviors).

As BOOM does not store the instruction bits in the ROB, a separate data structure (A "RoCC Shim") holds the instructions until the RoCC instruction can be committed and the RoCC command sent to the co-processor.

The source operands will also require access to BOOM’s register file. RoCC instructions are dispatched to the Issue Window, and scheduled so that they may access the read ports of the register file once the operands are available. The operands are then written into the RoCC Shim, which stores the operands and the instruction bits until they can be sent to the co-processor. This requires significant state.

After issue to RoCC, we track a queue of in-flight RoCC instructions, since we need to translate the logical destination register identifier from the RoCC response into the previously renamed physical destination register identifier.

Currently the RoCC interface does not support interrupts, exceptions, reusing the BOOM FPU, or direct access to the L1 data cache. This should all be straightforward to add, and will be completed as demand arises.

[1]This constraint could be relaxed by waiting for the un-pipelined unit to finish before de-asserting its busy signal and suppressing the valid output signal.
[2]Relaxing this constraint could be achieved by allowing multiple LSUs to talk to their own bank(s) of the data-cache, but the added complexity comes in allocating entries in the LSU before knowing the address, and thus which bank, a particular memory operation pertains to.
[3]Rocket instead handles write-port scheduling by killing and refetching the offending instruction (and all instructions behind it) if there is a write-port hazard detected. This would be far more heavy-handed to do in BOOM.
[4]It is cheaper to perform the SP-DP conversions than it is to instantiate a single-precision fdivSqrt unit.
[5]It is this ability to hold multiple inflight instructions within the unit simultaneously that breaks the “only one instruction at a time" assumption required by the UnpipelinedFunctionalUnit abstract class.
[6]There is a lot of room to play with regarding the CSRs. For example, it is probably a good idea to rename the register (dedicated for use by the supervisor) as it may see a lot of use in some kernel code and it causes no side-effects.
[7]The CSRFile is a Rocket component.