Refactor types: extract API for ttc and tt ##refactor

[officialcjunior]

Your checklist for this pull request

• I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository
• I made sure to follow the project's coding style
• I've added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible)
• I've updated the documentation and the rizin book with the relevant information (if needed)

Detailed description
This PR refactors a handful of places in cmd_type.c to use the API.
I've added two new RZ_APIs for the commands tt and ttc.
And they are:

RZ_API void rz_core_list_typename_alias_c(RzCore *core, const char *typedef_name);
RZ_API void rz_core_list_loaded_typedefs(RzCore *core, RzOutputMode mode);

Also added tests for ttj
Test plan
Firstly, we need to,

• Name the APIs correctly and put them in the right place.

I'm not sure whether I've made tc working fine. I am currently looking into that.
But anyway, all of them have written unit tests, so if the CI succeeds, we can say that they're working fine.

Closing issues

None.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #659 (3e8aee7) into dev (1fafb02) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 79.71%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #659      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.80%   42.78%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         869      869              
  Lines      316401   316410       +9     
==========================================
- Hits       135421   135366      -55     
- Misses     180980   181044      +64     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
librz/core/cmd.c	44.51% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
librz/core/cmd_type.c	69.65% <82.08%> (+2.47%)	⬆️
shlr/gdb/src/gdbclient/responses.c	15.03% <0.00%> (-18.43%)	⬇️
librz/debug/p/debug_gdb.c	48.19% <0.00%> (-12.14%)	⬇️
librz/reg/reg.c	77.77% <0.00%> (-5.26%)	⬇️
shlr/gdb/src/gdbclient/core.c	37.51% <0.00%> (-1.97%)	⬇️
librz/core/cmd_debug.c	27.33% <0.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
shlr/tcc/tccgen.c	39.76% <0.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
librz/util/sys.c	60.77% <0.00%> (+0.22%)	⬆️
librz/socket/socket.c	24.30% <0.00%> (+0.34%)	⬆️
... and 7 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fafb02...3e8aee7. Read the comment docs.

[XVilka]

Don't we have tests for those? Could you please add a couple? Will be helpful for the future RzTypes refactor as well.

[ret2libc]

name here as well?

[officialcjunior]

Don't we have tests for those? Could you please add a couple? Will be helpful for the future RzTypes refactor as well.

Added tests for tfc and tsc.
Do you know where I could find some enums and typenames/typedefs in the testbins, so that I could write tests for ttc and tuc?

[officialcjunior]

Don't we have tests for those? Could you please add a couple? Will be helpful for the future RzTypes refactor as well.
Which commands were you referring to?

Actually, I just realized that tsc, tfc, tuc and tec already had tests in db/cmd/types, which are fr the ones I just added.
So, should I revert these changes or keep it?

[ret2libc]

Please mark it as "ready to review" when we can have a look ;)

[XVilka]

One failing test:

[XX] db/cmd/types tt
RZ_NOPLUGINS=1 rizin -escr.utf8=0 -escr.color=0 -escr.interactive=0 -N -Qc 'td typedef char FILE_NAME;
tt FILE_NAME
"td typedef bool FLAG;"
tt FLAG
' -
-- stdout

[XVilka]

It's because tt commands expects an argument, and refactoring removed that. See the test - tt FLAG should return bool, tt FILE_NAME should return char.