Skip to content

support for ImageMagick morphology option #21

Closed
bf4 opened this Issue Jul 24, 2014 · 6 comments

3 participants

@bf4
rmagick member
bf4 commented Jul 24, 2014

Issue by goodwillta
Tuesday Nov 01, 2011 at 08:15 GMT
Originally opened as #35


morphology option is powerful and extremely handy, and has been available since ImageMagick 6.6.0-1. Are there any plans to include the option in rmagick? It would be greatly appreciated.

@bf4
rmagick member
bf4 commented Jul 24, 2014

Comment by mmaiza
Tuesday Nov 01, 2011 at 23:04 GMT


Thanks for pointing this out. I will take this into account for a future release of rmagick.

-----Original Message-----
From: goodwillta [mailto:reply@reply.github.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 4:15 AM
To: mmaiza
Subject: [rmagick] support for ImageMagick morphology option (#35)

morphology option is powerful and extremely handy, and has been available since ImageMagick 6.6.0-1. Are there any plans to include the option in rmagick? It would be greatly appreciated.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#35

@bf4
rmagick member
bf4 commented Jul 24, 2014

Comment by mksm
Thursday Nov 24, 2011 at 18:11 GMT


Since I really need this feature I'm sponsoring a programmer to have this included. I'll send in a pull request when it's done.

@bf4
rmagick member
bf4 commented Jul 24, 2014

Comment by mmaiza
Sunday Nov 27, 2011 at 22:18 GMT


Sounds good. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Amorim [mailto:reply@reply.github.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 1:12 PM
To: mmaiza
Subject: Re: [rmagick] support for ImageMagick morphology option (#35)

Since I really need this feature I'm sponsoring a programmer to have this included. I'll send in a pull request when it's done.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#35 (comment)

@bf4
rmagick member
bf4 commented Jul 24, 2014

Comment by lwille
Friday Aug 31, 2012 at 14:51 GMT


Any news on that?

@vassilevsky vassilevsky referenced this issue Apr 5, 2015
Closed

Morphology #184

@linduxed
linduxed commented Dec 6, 2015

@vassilevsky Do you feel we can close this, considering the discussion in #184?

@vassilevsky

Yes, there is no use in keeping this issue open.

@vassilevsky vassilevsky closed this Dec 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.