Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relax hard coded requirements for existing color pallette #46

Closed
3 tasks
ezavesky opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks

relax hard coded requirements for existing color pallette #46

ezavesky opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@ezavesky
Copy link
Contributor

While the current set of 9 colors works well in general for pattern detection, it's likely that we can optically optimize them for more lighting robustness. One simple example of this is experimenting for robustness in grayscale such that shadows, various temperatures of indoor lighting, and other effects are minimized.

Below is a living list of modifications that may be required to achieve this robustness:

  • Remove hard-coded of specific colors in team detection (like here and here and here).
  • Allow the geometry and rough region placement of patterns to be precisely mapped to a larger set of colors. Depending on tests, this may require loading and using actual image data in team pattern initialization instead of relying on color space separation alone.
    • Optionally, allow several more colors to be created as candidates during new LUT initialization here
@g3force
Copy link
Member

g3force commented Dec 17, 2017

Based on the discussions in #39 I would suggest to close this issue. We only use the standard patterns, so there is no need to generalize team patterns.
@ezavesky feel free to reopen the issue, if you feel like there is still something to do.

@g3force g3force closed this as completed Dec 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants