Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I want the sell= command tag to be able to recognize custom model data #246

Closed
3 tasks done
lohbsbot opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
3 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lohbsbot
Copy link

Terms

  • Have you checked the wiki page to see if your suggestion is already added?
  • Have you checked the Current bugs project to see if your suggestion was already submitted and or denied?
  • Have you asked if the feature already exists in the Discord Server? (Or got redirected to a Github issue here)

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I used the item-paywall tag to pay for the custom-item, but the customdata of the custom item was not recognized by the item-paywall.

Describe the solution you'd like

ex) sell= 3 EMERALD 1 cmd:1 is set
I wish there was a function to sell 1 emerald with a custom model data value of 1 when using a command tag.

Describe alternatives you've considered

It would be nice if a function to recognize customdata in sell= and a function to recognize customdata of custom-item in item-paywall tag would be added.

Screenshots/Videos (you can drag and drop files or paste links)

No response

@lohbsbot lohbsbot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 18, 2023
@rockyhawk64
Copy link
Owner

https://rockyhawk99.gitbook.io/rockyhawk-wiki/commandpanels/wiki/executing-commands/panel-tags
The sell tag is no longer receiving new features as the item-paywall= tag is more advanced and can do this already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants