RSpec tests for your Puppet manifests
Ruby
Latest commit 186fcc3 Nov 24, 2016 @DavidS DavidS committed on GitHub Merge pull request #426 from DavidS/update-tests
Rebase/integrate tests from #420

README.md

RSpec tests for your Puppet manifests & modules

Build Status Coverage Status

Installation

gem install rspec-puppet

Note for ruby 1.8 users: while rspec-puppet itself supports ruby 1.8, you'll need to pin rspec itself to ~> 3.1.0, as later rspec versions do not work on old rubies anymore.

Starting out with a new module

When you start out on a new module, run rspec-puppet-init to create the necessary files to configure rspec-puppet for your module's tests.

Configurate manifests for Puppet 4

By default in Puppet 3, the manifest is set to $manifestdir/site.pp. However as in Puppet 4 the default is now empty value to test manifests you will need to configurate your setting.

Puppet 3: https://docs.puppet.com/puppet/3.8/reference/configuration.html#manifest Puppet 4: https://docs.puppet.com/puppet/4.5/reference/configuration.html#manifest

Example code:

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.module_path     = File.join(File.dirname(File.expand_path(__FILE__)), 'fixtures', 'modules')
  c.manifest_dir    = File.join(File.dirname(File.expand_path(__FILE__)), 'fixtures', 'manifests')
  c.manifest        = File.join(File.dirname(File.expand_path(__FILE__)), 'fixtures', 'manifests', 'site.pp')
  c.environmentpath = File.join(Dir.pwd, 'spec')

  c.after(:suite) do
    RSpec::Puppet::Coverage.report!
  end
end

Naming conventions

For clarity and consistency, I recommend that you use the following directory structure and naming convention.

module
  |
  +-- manifests
  |
  +-- lib
  |
  +-- spec
       |
       +-- spec_helper.rb
       |
       +-- classes
       |     |
       |     +-- <class_name>_spec.rb
       |
       +-- defines
       |     |
       |     +-- <define_name>_spec.rb
       |
       +-- applications
       |     |
       |     +-- <application_name>_spec.rb
       |
       +-- functions
       |     |
       |     +-- <function_name>_spec.rb
       |
       +-- types
       |     |
       |     +-- <type_name>_spec.rb
       |
       +-- hosts
             |
             +-- <host_name>_spec.rb

Example groups

If you use the above directory structure, your examples will automatically be placed in the correct groups and have access to the custom matchers. If you choose not to, you can force the examples into the required groups as follows.

describe 'myclass', :type => :class do
  ...
end

describe 'mydefine', :type => :define do
  ...
end

describe 'myapplication', :type => :application do
  ...
end

describe 'myfunction', :type => :puppet_function do
  ...
end

describe 'mytype', :type => :type do
  ...
end

describe 'myhost.example.com', :type => :host do
  ...
end

Defined Types, Classes & Applications

Matchers

Checking if the catalog compiles

You can test whether the subject catalog compiles cleanly with compile.

it { is_expected.to compile }

To check the error messages of your class, you can check for raised error messages.

it { is_expected.to compile.and_raise_error(/error message match/) }

Checking if a resource exists

You can test if a resource exists in the catalogue with the generic contain_<resource type> matcher.

it { is_expected.to contain_augeas('bleh') }

You can also test if a class has been included in the catalogue with the same matcher.

it { is_expected.to contain_class('foo') }

Note that rspec-puppet does none of the class name parsing and lookup that the puppet parser would do for you. The matcher only accepts fully qualified classnames without any leading colons. That is a class foo::bar will only be matched by foo::bar, but not by ::foo::bar, or bar alone.

If your resource type includes :: (e.g. foo::bar simply replace the :: with __ (two underscores).

it { is_expected.to contain_foo__bar('baz') }

You can further test the parameters that have been passed to the resources with the generic with_<parameter> chains.

it { is_expected.to contain_package('mysql-server').with_ensure('present') }

If you want to specify that the given parameters should be the only ones passed to the resource, use the only_with_<parameter> chains.

it { is_expected.to contain_package('httpd').only_with_ensure('latest') }

You can use the with method to verify the value of multiple parameters.

it do
  is_expected.to contain_service('keystone').with(
    'ensure'     => 'running',
    'enable'     => 'true',
    'hasstatus'  => 'true',
    'hasrestart' => 'true'
  )
end

The same holds for the only_with method, which in addition verifies the exact set of parameters and values for the resource in the catalogue.

it do
  is_expected.to contain_user('luke').only_with(
    'ensure' => 'present',
    'uid'    => '501'
  )
end

You can also test that specific parameters have been left undefined with the generic without_<parameter> chains.

it { is_expected.to contain_file('/foo/bar').without_mode }

You can use the without method to verify that a list of parameters have not been defined

it { is_expected.to contain_service('keystone').without(
  ['restart', 'status']
)}

Checking the number of resources

You can test the number of resources in the catalogue with the have_resource_count matcher.

it { is_expected.to have_resource_count(2) }

The number of classes in the catalogue can be checked with the have_class_count matcher.

it { is_expected.to have_class_count(2) }

You can also test the number of a specific resource type, by using the generic have_<resource type>_resource_count matcher.

it { is_expected.to have_exec_resource_count(1) }

This last matcher also works for defined types. If the resource type contains ::, you can replace it with __ (two underscores).

it { is_expected.to have_logrotate__rule_resource_count(3) }

NOTE: when testing a class, the catalogue generated will always contain at least one class, the class under test. The same holds for defined types, the catalogue generated when testing a defined type will have at least one resource (the defined type itself).

Relationship matchers

The following methods will allow you to test the relationships between the resources in your catalogue, regardless of how the relationship is defined. This means that it doesn’t matter if you prefer to define your relationships with the metaparameters (require, before, notify and subscribe) or the chaining arrows (->, ~>, <- and <~), they’re all tested the same.

it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_requires('File[bar]') }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_comes_before('File[bar]') }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_notifies('File[bar]') }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_subscribes_to('File[bar]') }

An array can be used to test a resource for multiple relationships

it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_requires(['File[bar]', 'File[baz]']) }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_comes_before(['File[bar]','File[baz]']) }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_notifies(['File[bar]', 'File[baz]']) }
it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo').that_subscribes_to(['File[bar]', 'File[baz]']) }

You can also test the reverse direction of the relationship, so if you have the following bit of Puppet code

notify { 'foo': }
notify { 'bar':
  before => Notify['foo'],
}

You can test that Notify[bar] comes before Notify[foo]

it { is_expected.to contain_notify('bar').that_comes_before('Notify[foo]') }

Or, you can test that Notify[foo] requires Notify[bar]

it { is_expected.to contain_notify('foo').that_requires('Notify[bar]') }
Match target syntax

Note that this notation does not support any of the features you're used from the puppet language. Only a single resource with a single, unquoted title can be referenced here. Class names need to be always fully qualified and not have the leading ::. It currently does not support inline arrays or quoting.

These work

  • Notify[foo]
  • Class[profile::apache]

These will not work

  • Notify['foo']
  • Notify[foo, bar]
  • Class[::profile::apache]
Recursive dependencies

The relationship matchers are recursive in two directions:

  • vertical recursion, which checks for dependencies with parents of the resource (i.e. the resource is contained, directly or not, in the class involved in the relationship). E.g. where Package['foo'] comes before File['/foo']:
class { 'foo::install': } ->
class { 'foo::config': }

class foo::install {
  package { 'foo': }
}

class foo::config {
  file { '/foo': }
}
  • horizontal recursion, which follows indirect dependencies (dependencies of dependencies). E.g. where Yumrepo['foo'] comes before File['/foo']:
class { 'foo::repo': } ->
class { 'foo::install': } ->
class { 'foo::config': }

class foo::repo {
  yumrepo { 'foo': }
}

class foo::install {
  package { 'foo': }
}

class foo::config {
  file { '/foo': }
}
Autorequires

Autorequires are considered in dependency checks.

Type matcher

When testing custom types, the be_valid_type matcher provides a range of expectations:

  • with_provider(<provider_name>): check that the right provider was selected
  • with_properties(<property_list>): check that the specified properties are available
  • with_parameters(<parameter_list>): check that the specified parameters are available
  • with_features(<feature_list>): check that the specified features are available
  • with_set_attributes(<param_value_hash>): check that the specified attributes are set

Writing tests

Basic test structure

To test that

sysctl { 'baz'
  value => 'foo',
}

Will cause the following resource to be in included in catalogue for a host

exec { 'sysctl/reload':
  command => '/sbin/sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf',
}

We can write the following testcase (in spec/defines/sysctl_spec.rb)

describe 'sysctl' do
  let(:title) { 'baz' }
  let(:params) { { :value => 'foo' } }

  it { is_expected.to contain_exec('sysctl/reload').with_command("/sbin/sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf") }
end

Specifying the title of a resource

let(:title) { 'foo' }

Specifying the parameters to pass to a resources or parameterised class

Parameters of a defined type, class or application can be passed defining :params in a let, and passing it a hash as seen below.

let(:params) { {:ensure => 'present', ...} }

For passing Puppet's undef as a paremeter value, you can simply use :undef and it will be translated to undef when compiling. For example:

let(:params) { {:user => :undef, ...} }

For references to nodes or resources as seen when using require or before properties, or an application resource you can pass the string as an argument to the ref helper:

let(:params) { :require => ref('Package', 'sudoku') }

Which translates to:

mydefine { 'mytitle': require => Package['sudoku'] }

Another example, for an application setup (when using app_management):

let(:params) { { :nodes => { ref('Node', 'dbnode') => ref('Myapp::Mycomponent', 'myapp') } } }

Will translate to:

site { myapp { 'myimpl': nodes => { Node['dbnode'] => Myapp::Mycomponent['myimpl'] } } }

Specifying the FQDN of the test node

If the manifest you're testing expects to run on host with a particular name, you can specify this as follows

let(:node) { 'testhost.example.com' }

Specifying the environment name

If the manifest you're testing expects to evaluate the environment name, you can specify this as follows

let(:environment) { 'production' }

Specifying the facts that should be available to your manifest

By default, the test environment contains no facts for your manifest to use. You can set them with a hash

let(:facts) { {:operatingsystem => 'Debian', :kernel => 'Linux', ...} }

Facts may be expressed as a value (shown in the previous example) or a structure. Fact keys may be expressed as either symbols or strings. A key will be converted to a lower case string to align with the Facter standard

let(:facts) { {:os => { :family => 'RedHat', :release => { :major => '7', :minor => '1', :full => '7.1.1503' } } } }

You can also create a set of default facts provided to all specs in your spec_helper:

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.default_facts = {
    :operatingsystem => 'Ubuntu'
  }
end

Any facts you provide with let(:facts) in a spec will automatically be merged on top of the default facts.

Specifying the path to find your modules

I recommend setting a default module path by adding the following code to your spec_helper.rb

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.module_path = '/path/to/your/module/dir'
end

However, if you want to specify it in each example, you can do so

let(:module_path) { '/path/to/your/module/dir' }

Testing Exported Resources

You can test if a resource was exported from the catalogue by using the exported_resources accessor in combination with any of the standard matchers.

You can use exported_resources as the subject of a child context:

context 'exported resources' do
  subject { exported_resources }

  it { is_expected.to contain_file('foo') }
end

You can also use exported_resources directly in a test:

it { expect(exported_resources).to contain_file('foo') }

Testing applications

Applications in some ways behave as defined resources, but are more complex so require a number of elements already documented above to be combined for testing.

A full example of the simplest rspec test for a single component application:

require 'spec_helper'

describe 'orch_app' do
  let(:node) { 'my_node' }
  let(:title) { 'my_awesome_app' }
  let(:params) do
    {
      :nodes => {
        ref('Node', node) => ref('Orch_app::Db', title),
      }
    }
  end

  it { should compile }
  it { should contain_orch_app(title) }
end

Each piece is required:

  • You must turn on app_management during testing for the handling to work
  • The :node definition is required to be set so later on you can reference it in the :nodes argument within :params
  • Applications act like defined resources, and each require a :title to be defined
  • The :nodes key in :params requires the use of node reference mappings to resource mappings. The ref keyword allows you to provide these (a normal string will not work).

Beyond these requirements, the very basic should compile test and other matchers as you would expect will work the same as classes and defined resources.

Note: for the moment, cross-node support is not available and will return an error. Ensure you model your tests to be single-node for the time being.

Functions

Matchers

All of the standard RSpec matchers are available for you to use when testing Puppet functions.

it 'should be able to do something' do
  subject.call(['foo']) == 'bar'
end

For your convenience though, a run matcher exists to provide easier to understand test cases.

it { is_expected.to run.with_params('foo').and_return('bar') }

Writing tests

Basic test structure

require 'spec_helper'

describe '<function name>' do
  ...
end

Specifying the name of the function to test

The name of the function must be provided in the top level description, e.g.

describe 'split' do

Specifying the arguments to pass to the function

You can specify the arguments to pass to your function during the test(s) using either the with_params chain method in the run matcher

it { is_expected.to run.with_params('foo', 'bar', ['baz']) }

Or by using the call method on the subject directly

it 'something' do
  subject.call(['foo', 'bar', ['baz']])
end

Testing the results of the function

You can test the result of a function (if it produces one) using either the and_returns chain method in the run matcher

it { is_expected.to run.with_params('foo').and_return('bar') }

Or by using any of the existing RSpec matchers on the subject directly

it 'something' do
  subject.call(['foo']) == 'bar'
  subject.call(['baz']).should be_an Array
end

Testing the errors thrown by the function

You can test whether the function throws an exception using either the and_raises_error chain method in the run matcher

it { is_expected.to run.with_params('a', 'b').and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }
it { is_expected.not_to run.with_params('a').and_raise_error(Puppet::ParseError) }

Or by using the existing raises_error RSpec matcher

it 'something' do
  expect { subject.call(['a', 'b']) }.should raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
  expect { subject.call(['a']) }.should_not raise_error(Puppet::ParseError)
end

Accessing the parser scope where the function is running

Some complex functions require access to the current parser's scope, e.g. for stubbing other parts of the system.

before(:each) { scope.expects(:lookupvar).with('some_variable').returns('some_value') }
it { is_expected.to run.with_params('...').and_return('...') }

Note that this does not work when testing manifests which use custom functions. Instead, you'll need to create a replacement function directly.

before(:each) do
    Puppet::Parser::Functions.newfunction(:custom_function, :type => :rvalue) { |args|
        raise ArgumentError, 'expected foobar' unless args[0] == 'foobar'
        'expected value'
    }
end

Hiera integration

Configuration

Set the hiera config symbol properly in your spec files:

let(:hiera_config) { 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml' }
hiera = Hiera.new(:config => 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml')

Create your spec hiera files

spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml

---
:backends:
  - yaml
:hierarchy:
  - test
:yaml:
  :datadir: 'spec/fixtures/hiera'

spec/fixtures/hiera/test.yaml

---
ntpserver: ['ntp1.domain.com','ntpXX.domain.com']
user:
  oneuser:
    shell: '/bin/bash'
  twouser:
    shell: '/sbin/nologin'

Use hiera in your tests

  ntpserver = hiera.lookup('ntpserver', nil, nil)
  let(:params) { :ntpserver => ntpserver }

Enabling hiera lookups

If you just want to fetch values from hiera (e.g. because you're testing code that uses explicit hiera lookups) just specify the path to the hiera config in your spec_helper.rb

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.hiera_config = 'spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml'
end

spec/fixtures/hiera/hiera.yaml

---
:backends:
  - yaml
:yaml:
  :datadir: spec/fixtures/hieradata
:hierarchy:
  - common

Producing coverage reports

You can output a basic resource coverage report with the following in your spec_helper.rb

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.after(:suite) do
    RSpec::Puppet::Coverage.report!
  end
end

This checks which Puppet resources have been explicitly checked as part of the current test run and outputs both a coverage percentage and a list of untouched resources.

A desired code coverage level can be provided. If this level is not achieved, a test failure will be raised. This can be used with a CI service, such as Jenkins or Bamboo, to enforce code coverage. The following example requires the code coverage to be at least 95%.

RSpec.configure do |c|
  c.after(:suite) do
    RSpec::Puppet::Coverage.report!(95)
  end
end

Related projects

For a list of other module development tools see https://puppet.community/plugins/