Permalink
Browse files

post about the sympathizer

  • Loading branch information...
rokob committed Sep 4, 2017
1 parent e072246 commit 9aa3560ff130824e5f69d8d436a32cefe9ae4990
Showing with 42 additions and 0 deletions.
  1. +42 −0 _posts/2017-07-30-the-sympathizer.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
layout: post
title: The Sympathizer
date: '2017-07-30T22:11:11-07:00'
categories: book
tags: book fiction great
---
Again on my search for things to read I went back to books that have won prizes and came up with
[*The Sympathizer*][symp-amazon] the winner of the Pulitzer Prize for fiction. A story told with a
nonlinear timeline, unfolding details about who and what the narrator is, a fiction which could very
well have been fact. The language is literary almost too at fault at times. Yet the overall piece
once everything is unfolded makes complete sense given all you learn.
There is much in this book about identity, culture, and belonging to a community. Along
with all these themes are the opposites experienced by their loss. I think this book really is one
about feelings of loss and grief, however in the end we are left with a sense that this is life.
> To live was to be haunted by the inevitability of one's own decay, and to be dead was to be
> haunted by the memory of living.
At certain times depending on where you find yourself on the roller coaster of emotions you can feel
envy for the dead
> All of us who are living are dying. The only ones not dying are the dead.
Whether you feel that way or not, the author makes a character who most people probably cannot find
any surface level similarity to relateable. Perhaps it is the continual search for identity and
understanding personified in
> This is most crucial, for we are the ones most able to know ourselves and yet the most unable to
> know ourselves.
I highly recommend this book, even if it is difficult to get through at times. The language comes
across as written by a non-native speaker which I believe is true. I say that only because there are
a fair amount of words that I had to look up because I find well educated non-native speakers
sometimes have overly developed vocabularies. Not that they use the wrong words, just that they use
the exactly correct specific word where a lesser writer might use something more general.
Nonetheless, I understand why it won the Pulitzer.
[symp-amazon]: http://a.co/4GVUqD6

0 comments on commit 9aa3560

Please sign in to comment.