New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
additional validation errors #48
Comments
Fixes checked in PR #49 . |
Closed by #49 Please let me know if now would be a good time to prepare a CRAN release for these changes? Or shall we hold tight and see if there's any remaining validation issues we can squash first? @mbjones would you be willing to send another PR with updates to NEWS.md describing the validator changes? Also, the DESCRIPTION author list is now out of date -- may I add you and @amoeba as co-authors there? |
I think another release now would be good -- those were serious errors and we should get them out into the community so that there's less confusion over correct validation. I'll send another PR and update both files, and I'll bump the version to 0.4.0 in DESCRIPTION. Do you want to run |
Thanks! Feel free either way on the |
I found additional validation errors in addition to #46.
packageId
is not used as an identifier for checking uniqueness with otherid
values and for resolving references.annotation
elements inadditionalMetadata
because their parent doesn't contain anid
. This should be ok, because inadditionalMetadata
the annotation subject is determined via thedescribes
fields.annotation/@references
attribute values are not checked during validation to be sure they resolve to anid
-- only the//references
elements are checked.I've begun implementing fixes for these in my fork here: https://github.com/mbjones/emld/tree/46-validation-errors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: