Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

no match for 'operator==' error #245

Open
k-ish0212 opened this issue Dec 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

no match for 'operator==' error #245

k-ish0212 opened this issue Dec 27, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@k-ish0212
Copy link

I've encountered such an error when compiling ros2 humble. It looks rcputils::fs::path operator error but the operator seems compiled through colcon build.

Starting >>> rcpputils
Starting >>> rosidl_runtime_c
--- stderr: orocos_kdl_vendor
Cloning into 'orocos_kdl-507de66'...
HEAD is now at 507de66 Fix CMake warning on Windows (#392)
Submodule 'python_orocos_kdl/pybind11' (https://github.com/pybind/pybind11.git) registered for path 'python_orocos_kdl/pybind11'
Cloning into '/root/xarm/ros2_humble/build/orocos_kdl_vendor/orocos_kdl-507de66-prefix/src/orocos_kdl-507de66/python_orocos_kdl/pybind11'...


Finished <<< orocos_kdl_vendor [56.3s]
Starting >>> python_orocos_kdl_vendor
Finished <<< python_orocos_kdl_vendor [2.23s]
Finished <<< rosidl_runtime_c [15.1s]
Starting >>> rosidl_runtime_cpp
Starting >>> rosidl_generator_c
Starting >>> rmw
Starting >>> rosidl_typesupport_introspection_c
Finished <<< rcpputils [16.9s]
Starting >>> rcl_logging_interface
Starting >>> libyaml_vendor
Starting >>> class_loader
Finished <<< rosidl_typesupport_introspection_c [6.88s]
Finished <<< rosidl_generator_c [10.9s]
Finished <<< rcl_logging_interface [10.3s]
Starting >>> rcl_logging_noop
Starting >>> rcl_logging_spdlog
Finished <<< rcl_logging_noop [1.88s]
--- stderr: libyaml_vendor
Cloning into 'libyaml-0.2.5'...
HEAD is now at 2c891fc Changes for v0.2.5 release


Finished <<< libyaml_vendor [13.0s]
Finished <<< rosidl_runtime_cpp [15.0s]
Starting >>> rosidl_generator_cpp
Starting >>> rosidl_typesupport_introspection_cpp
Finished <<< class_loader [18.5s]

Starting >>> pluginlib
Finished <<< rosidl_typesupport_introspection_cpp [6.20s]
Finished <<< rcl_logging_spdlog [10.2s]
Finished <<< rmw [27.9s]
Starting >>> rcl_yaml_param_parser
--- stderr: pluginlib
In file included from /root/xarm/ros2_humble/src/ros/pluginlib/pluginlib/include/pluginlib/class_loader.hpp:334,
from /root/xarm/ros2_humble/src/ros/pluginlib/pluginlib/test/utest.cpp:33:
/root/xarm/ros2_humble/src/ros/pluginlib/pluginlib/include/pluginlib/./class_loader_imp.hpp: In member function ‘std::string pluginlib::ClassLoader::getPackageFromPluginXMLFilePath(const string&)’:
/root/xarm/ros2_humble/src/ros/pluginlib/pluginlib/include/pluginlib/./class_loader_imp.hpp:589:39: error: no match for ‘operator==’ (operand types are ‘rcpputils::fs::path’ and ‘rcpputils::fs::path’)
589 | if (parent.string().empty() || (p == parent)) {
| ~ ^~ ~~~~~~
| | |
| | rcpputils::fs::path
| rcpputils::fs::path
make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/pluginlib_utest.dir/build.make:63: CMakeFiles/pluginlib_utest.dir/test/utest.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:187: CMakeFiles/pluginlib_utest.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:141: all] Error 2


Failed <<< pluginlib [7.80s, exited with code 2]
Aborted <<< rcl_yaml_param_parser [2.20s]
Aborted <<< rosidl_generator_cpp [24.5s]
Aborted <<< fastrtps [2min 41s]
Aborted <<< rviz_ogre_vendor [4min 14s]

Summary: 139 packages finished [4min 39s]
1 package failed: pluginlib

Does anyone know how to solve it?
Thank you.

@jdlangs
Copy link

jdlangs commented Mar 2, 2023

Based on your file paths, I'm guessing you're trying to build Humble in a 20.04 container which I am doing too and I saw the exact same error. It was because I forgot to remove the Foxy versions of packages on the AMENT_PREFIX_PATH. So I believe pluginlib was compiling against the wrong version of rcpputils.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants