Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DIC - CodeExplorer #60

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

DIC - CodeExplorer #60

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

IDE Colorizer looks weird with CodeExplorer.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by david.lo...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2014 at 6:45

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

Can you provide more details about your issue report? 

Original comment by Rodrigo.Ruz.V@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2014 at 12:28

  • Changed title: DIC - CodeExplorer
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

[deleted comment]
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

You have to test it with CodeExplorer to see what is going on. 

Original comment by david.lo...@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2014 at 6:07

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

 Sorry, but CodeExplorer is not supported for the plugin, For now I will only focus  in support open source and freeware plugins like GExperts and CNWizards.

Original comment by Rodrigo.Ruz.V@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2014 at 6:17

  • Changed state: WontFix
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

Ah that is too bad because it is very popular.

Original comment by david.lo...@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2014 at 6:18

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter commented May 29, 2015

Unfortunately this wizard uses too many third party components , which require 
a lot of effort (time) to hook.

Original comment by Rodrigo.Ruz.V@gmail.com on 17 Jun 2014 at 6:22

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant