You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Data.tables are usually considerably faster to process than data frames. I was looking for ways to convert raster objects to data.tables preserving as much information as I could, and I just stumbled upon this function written by Etienne Racine: https://gist.github.com/etiennebr/9515738.
Then I was wondering: any chance this function could be included in the raster package as a native one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Data.tables are usually considerably faster to process than data frames. I was looking for ways to convert raster objects to data.tables preserving as much information as I could, and I just stumbled upon this function written by Etienne Racine: https://gist.github.com/etiennebr/9515738.
Then I was wondering: any chance this function could be included in the raster package as a native one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: