ControllerExampleGroup documentation and isolation_from_views.feature inconsistent #313

Closed
cgriego opened this Issue Jan 24, 2011 · 2 comments

2 participants

@cgriego

The ControllerExampleGroup documentation gives the spiel about testing controllers in isolation and says that the view does not even have to exist. The controller isolation_from_views.feature states that unlike rspec-rails 1.x, the view file is required in 2.x.

If I had a preference, I'd like the old behavior back so that controllers are truly tested in isolation, but this ticket would be satisfied if the documentation was just consistent.

@dchelimsky
RSpec member

We have the same preference. It's just not feasible due to changes in Rails 3.

@dchelimsky
RSpec member

Update rdoc for controller specs.

@amatsuda amatsuda pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2011
@dchelimsky dchelimsky Update rdoc for controller specs.
- Closes #313.
4e37c9b
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment