Move some important bits of description up #84
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The description of how an assertion is constructed seemed to imply that the object with the fingerprints was what went in a=identity. You had to read much further down to learn this. This just moves some of the critical text up, duplicating it really, so that this confusion is less likely.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The description of how an assertion is constructed seemed to imply that
the object with the fingerprints was what went in a=identity. You had
to read much further down to learn that this wasn't right and that it was
really the assertion. This just moves some of the
critical text up, duplicating it really, so that this confusion is less
likely.