False positive FunctionReturnValueDiscardedInspection with Err.Raise Sub

[IvenBach]

Rubberduck version information
Version 2.5.0.29079
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18362.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Office 2016 x64
Host Version: 16.0.4978.1000
Host Executable: EXCEL.EXE

Description
The inspection is triggering on a Sub.

Public Sub MVCE()
    Err.Raise -1, "Foo", "Bar"
End Sub

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Insert module, Add above code, Parse & view inspections

Expected behavior
Have inspection trigger only on functions.

[MDoerner]

The inspection result is not for Err.Raise, it is for Err itself. The thing the inspection does not anticipate its that there is a valid scenario for a throw-away object returned from a function. Technically, Err is not an object reference but a function returning the ErrObject. The inspection complains about the fact that you just make a member call and then silently discard the object.

Because of the particular design of this, it is actually valid to do that. For user code, having a function (not property) providing throw-away objects would be kind of a code smell.

My suggestion to handle this is the make a member call on the returned object sufficient as long as the function is not user-defined.

[IvenBach]

My thinking was so much shallower than that. I opened this issue since on the ErrorObject the member Raise(...) is, according to the object browser, a Sub instead of a Function.

[retailcoder]

Merged, but part of me thinks there's valuable info being silenced, ...OTOH we don't have per-inspection configuration settings, so only flagging user code seems the best compromise.