Skip to content

CAA DNS RR - #1732

Closed
aeris wants to merge 2 commits into
ruby:masterfrom
aeris:caa
Closed

CAA DNS RR#1732
aeris wants to merge 2 commits into
ruby:masterfrom
aeris:caa

Conversation

@aeris

@aeris aeris commented Oct 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Introduce CAA RR DNS record on Resolv, defined in RFC 6844.

Changes on the way Resource::decode_rdata works because CAA needs to know the
overall RR length, which was previously swallowed.

@aeris

aeris commented Oct 29, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I open issue 14066 on Redmine for that PR

Comment thread lib/resolv.rb Outdated
# Creates a new CAA for +flag+, +tag+ and +value+.

def initialize(flag, tag, value)
@flag, @tag, @value = flag, tag, value

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Elsewhere in this file assignment to instance variables is done using one line per assignment. Perhaps you want to align with the existing code-style?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed :)

@k0kubun
k0kubun changed the base branch from trunk to master August 15, 2019 17:36
k0kubun added a commit to aeris/ruby that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
@k0kubun
k0kubun requested a review from akr December 31, 2019 08:43
aeris added 2 commits October 25, 2023 14:14
Introduce CAA RR DNS record on `Resolv`, defined in [RFC 6844](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6844).

Changes on the way `Resource::decode_rdata` works because CAA needs to know the
overall RR length, which was previously swallowed.
@jarthod

jarthod commented Feb 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for this PR, I was also looking for this and so am currently using the patch.

Is there anything blocking this from being upstreamed into ruby? CAA is a fairly standard and widely adopted DNS record type now.

@hanazuki

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I rebased this patch and filed a PR in the upstream repository. ruby/resolv#48

@jarthod

jarthod commented Feb 29, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @hanazuki !

@yhaman15 yhaman15 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

毎時的な承認なしに一般的なフィードバックをサブミット

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants