Skip to content

Conversation

@y-yagi
Copy link
Contributor

@y-yagi y-yagi commented Feb 2, 2025

Currently, some warning messages don't contain a URI like the following.

warning: URI::ABS_URI is obsolete. Use RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[:ABS_URI] explicitly.

But, without URI prefix, the suggested value doesn't work. So I think we should use a fully qualified name to avoid confusion.

Currently, some warning messages don't contain a `URI` like the following.

```ruby
warning: URI::ABS_URI is obsolete. Use RFC2396_PARSER.regexp[:ABS_URI] explicitly.
```

But, without `URI` prefix, the suggested value doesn't work.
So I think we should use a fully qualified name to avoid confusion.
@hsbt
Copy link
Member

hsbt commented Feb 27, 2025

👍

@hsbt hsbt merged commit 1451efa into ruby:master Feb 27, 2025
26 checks passed
@y-yagi y-yagi deleted the use_fully_qualified_name branch February 27, 2025 04:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants