Gem name restrictions might be wrong #426

Closed
tenderlove opened this Issue May 16, 2012 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@tenderlove
Contributor

tenderlove commented May 16, 2012

According to this line, gem names are required to have letters. However, the regular expression on the line above only enforces that the gem name contains some non-digit character. That means '2.2' is a valid gem name, but it contains no letters. I'm not sure what the rule is supposed to be, but I thought I'd file a ticket.

@adkron

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@adkron

adkron Nov 4, 2012

Contributor

I've got this with @sandersch

Contributor

adkron commented Nov 4, 2012

I've got this with @sandersch

@cmeiklejohn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@cmeiklejohn

cmeiklejohn Nov 5, 2012

Contributor

Closing.

Contributor

cmeiklejohn commented Nov 5, 2012

Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment