Skip to content

Conversation

@Baltoli
Copy link
Contributor

@Baltoli Baltoli commented Jun 28, 2024

Now that Pyk and K have aligned their respective versions of Nixpkgs, we can begin to clean up some of the Nix code that was previously required to work around them being separated.

Copy link
Contributor

@goodlyrottenapple goodlyrottenapple left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. One thing we could also tighten up would be to make everything depend on the same rv_utils down the chain. Even though we point to the same rv_utils independently, in the flake lock, we have 4 copies. Having only one copy should prevent subtle bugs where once copy could potentially be different to the rest...

@Baltoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

Baltoli commented Jun 28, 2024

Ah, that's a good point. I'll follow up on that in the K toolchain repositories separately.

@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins merged commit fd9c3f5 into master Jun 28, 2024
@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins deleted the nix-cleanup branch June 28, 2024 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants