Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support generic target tables and env variables #9603

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jameshilliard
Copy link
Contributor

When building for targets from a meta build system like buildroot it is preferable to be able to unconditionally set target config/env variables without having to care about the target triple as we use target specific toolchains that will only support a single target architecture typically.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Eh2406

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 19, 2021
@jameshilliard jameshilliard force-pushed the generic-config branch 15 times, most recently from dea5a53 to b794b44 Compare June 24, 2021 00:14
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 23, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #9821) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jameshilliard jameshilliard force-pushed the generic-config branch 2 times, most recently from 6651105 to ef6d87b Compare December 27, 2022 21:39
When building for targets from a meta build system like buildroot it
is preferable to be able to unconditionally set target config/env
variables without having to care about the target triple as we use
target specific toolchains that will only support a single target
architecture typically.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 21, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #11745) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants