Find file
e72daa0 Apr 8, 2016
274 lines (217 sloc) 13 KB


Stabilize implementing panics as aborts.

  • Stabilize the -Z no-landing-pads flag under the name -C panic=strategy
  • Implement a number of unstable features akin to custom allocators to swap out implementations of panic just before a final product is generated.
  • Add a [] option to Cargo to configure how panics are implemented.


Panics in Rust have long since been implemented with the intention of being caught at particular boundaries (for example the thread boundary). This is quite useful for isolating failures in Rust code, for example:

  • Servers can avoid taking down the entire process but can instead just take down one request.
  • Embedded Rust libraries can avoid taking down the entire process and can instead gracefully inform the caller that an internal logic error occurred.
  • Rust applications can isolate failure from various components. The classical example of this is Servo can display a "red X" for an image which fails to decode instead of aborting the entire browser or killing an entire page.

While these are examples where a recoverable panic is useful, there are many applications where recovering panics is undesirable or doesn't lead to anything productive:

  • Rust applications which use Result for error handling typically use panic! to indicate a fatal error, in which case the process should be taken down.
  • Many applications simply can't recover from an internal assertion failure, so there's no need trying to recover it.
  • To implement a recoverable panic, the compiler and standard library use a method called stack unwinding. The compiler must generate code to support this unwinding, however, and this takes time in codegen and optimizers.
  • Low-level applications typically don't use unwinding at all as there's no stack unwinder (e.g. kernels).

Note: as an idea of the compile-time and object-size savings from disabling the extra codegen, compiling Cargo as a library is 11% faster (16s from 18s) and 13% smaller (15MB to 13MB). Sizable gains!

Overall, the ability to recover panics is something that needs to be decided at the application level rather than at the language level. Currently the compiler does not support the ability to translate panics to process aborts in a stable fashion, and the purpose of this RFC is to add such a venue.

With such an important codegen option, however, as whether or not exceptions can be caught, it's easy to get into a situation where libraries of mixed compilation modes are linked together, causing odd or unknown errors. This RFC proposes a situation similar to the design of custom allocators to alleviate this situation.

Detailed design

The major goal of this RFC is to develop a work flow around managing crates which wish to disable unwinding. This intends to set forth a complete vision for how these crates interact with the ecosystem at large. Much of this design will be similar to the custom allocator RFC.

High level design

This section serves as a high-level tour through the design proposed in this RFC. The linked sections provide more complete explanation as to what each step entails.

  • The compiler will have a new stable flag, -C panic which will configure how unwinding-related code is generated.
  • Two new unstable attributes will be added to the compiler, #![needs_panic_runtime] and #![panic_runtime]. The standard library will need a runtime and will be lazily linked to a crate which has #![panic_runtime].
  • Two unstable crates tagged with #![panic_runtime] will be distributed as the runtime implementation of panicking, panic_abort and panic_unwind crates. The former will translate all panics to process aborts, whereas the latter will be implemented as unwinding is today, via the system stack unwinder.
  • Cargo will gain a new panic option in the [] sections to indicate how that profile should compile panic support.

New Compiler Flags

The first component to this design is to have a stable flag to the compiler which configures how panic-related code is generated. This will be stabilized in the form:

$ rustc -C help

Available codegen options:

    -C             panic=val -- strategy to compile in for panic related code

There will currently be two supported strategies:

  • unwind - this is what the compiler implements by default today via the invoke LLVM instruction.
  • abort - this will implement that -Z no-landing-pads does today, which is to disable the invoke instruction and use call instead everywhere.

This codegen option will default to unwind if not specified (what happens today), and the value will be encoded into the crate metadata. This option is planned with extensibility in mind to future panic strategies if we ever implement some (return-based unwinding is at least one other possible option).

Panic Attributes

Very similarly to custom allocators, two new unstable crate attributes will be added to the compiler:

  • #![needs_panic_runtime] - indicates that this crate requires a "panic runtime" to link correctly. This will be attached to the standard library and is not intended to be attached to any other crate.
  • #![panic_runtime] - indicates that this crate is a runtime implementation of panics.

As with allocators, there are a number of limitations imposed by these attributes by the compiler:

  • Any crate DAG can only contain at most one instance of #![panic_runtime].
  • Implicit dependency edges are drawn from crates tagged with #![needs_panic_runtime] to those tagged with #![panic_runtime]. Loops as usual are forbidden (e.g. a panic runtime can't depend on libstd).
  • Complete artifacts which include a crate tagged with #![needs_panic_runtime] must include a panic runtime. This includes executables, dylibs, and staticlibs. If no panic runtime is explicitly linked, then the compiler will select an appropriate runtime to inject.
  • Finally, the compiler will ensure that panic runtimes and compilation modes are not mismatched. For a final product (outputs that aren't rlibs) the -C panic mode of the panic runtime must match the final product itself. If the panic mode is abort, then no other validation is performed, but otherwise all crates in the DAG must have the same value of -C panic.

The purpose of these limitations is to solve a number of problems that arise when switching panic strategies. For example with aborting panic crates won't have to link to runtime support of unwinding, or rustc will disallow mixing panic strategies by accident.

The actual API of panic runtimes will not be detailed in this RFC. These new attributes will be unstable, and consequently the API itself will also be unstable. It suffices to say, however, that like custom allocators a panic runtime will implement some public extern symbols known to the crates that need a panic runtime, and that's how they'll communicate/link up.

Panic Crates

Two new unstable crates will be added to the distribution for each target:

  • panic_unwind - this is an extraction of the current implementation of panicking from the standard library. It will use the same mechanism of stack unwinding as is implemented on all current platforms.
  • panic_abort - this is a new implementation of panicking which will simply translate unwinding to process aborts. There will be no runtime support required by this crate.

The compiler will assume that these crates are distributed for each platform where the standard library is also distributed (e.g. a crate that has #![needs_panic_runtime]).

Compiler defaults

The compiler will ship with a few defaults which affect how panic runtimes are selected in Rust programs. Specifically:

  • The -C panic option will default to unwind as it does today.
  • The libtest crate will explicitly link to panic_unwind. The test runner that libtest implements relies on equating panics with failure and cannot work if panics are translated to aborts.
  • If no panic runtime is explicitly selected, the compiler will employ the following logic to decide what panic runtime to inject:

    1. If any crate in the DAG is compiled with -C panic=abort, then panic_abort will be injected.
    2. If all crates in the DAG are compiled with -C panic=unwind, then panic_unwind is injected.

Cargo changes

In order to export this new feature to Cargo projects, a new option will be added to the [profile] section of manifests:

panic = 'unwind'

This will cause Cargo to pass -C panic=unwind to all rustc invocations for a crate graph. Cargo will have special knowledge, however, that for cargo test it cannot pass -C panic=abort.


  • The implementation of custom allocators was no small feat in the compiler, and much of this RFC is essentially the same thing. Similar infrastructure can likely be leveraged to alleviate the implementation complexity, but this is undeniably a large change to the compiler for albeit a relatively minor option. The counter point to this, however, is that disabling unwinding in a principled fashion provides far higher quality error messages, prevents erroneous situations, and provides an immediate benefit for many Rust users today.

  • The binary distribution of the standard library will not change from what it is today. In other words, the standard library (and dependency crates like libcore) will be compiled with -C panic=unwind. This introduces the opportunity for extra code bloat or missed optimizations in applications that end up disabling unwinding in the long run. Distribution, however, is far easier because there's only one copy of the standard library and we don't have to rely on any other form of infrastructure.

  • This represents a proliferation of the #![needs_foo] and #![foo] style system that allocators have begun. This may be indicative of a deeper underlying requirement here of the standard library or perhaps showing how the strategy in the standard library needs to change. If the standard library were a crate it would arguably support these options via Cargo features, but without that option is this the best way to be implementing these switches for the standard library?


  • Currently this RFC allows mixing multiple panic runtimes in a crate graph so long as the actual runtime is compiled with -C panic=abort. This is primarily done to immediately reap benefit from -C panic=abort even though the standard library we distribute will still have unwinding support compiled in (compiled with -C panic=unwind). In the not-too-distant future however, we will likely be poised to distribute multiple binary copies of the standard library compiled with different profiles. We may be able to tighten this restriction on behalf of the compiler, requiring that all crates in a DAG have the same -C panic compilation mode, but there would unfortunately be no immediate benefit to implementing the RFC from users of our precompiled nightlies.

    This alternative, additionally, can also be viewed as a drawback. It's unclear what a future libstd distribution mechanism would look like and how this RFC might interact with it. Stabilizing disabling unwinding via a compiler switch or a Cargo profile option may not end up meshing well with the strategy we pursue with shipping multiple standard libraries.

  • Instead of the panic runtime support in this RFC, we could instead just ship two different copies of the standard library where one simply translates panics to abort instead of unwinding. This is unfortunately very difficult for Cargo or the compiler to track, however, to ensure that the codegen option of how panics are translated is propagated throughout the rest of the crate graph. Additionally it may be easy to mix up crates of different panic strategies.

Unresolved questions

  • One possible implementation of unwinding is via return-based flags. Much of this RFC is designed with the intention of supporting arbitrary unwinding implementations, but it's unclear whether it's too heavily biased towards panic is either unwinding or aborting.

  • The current implementation of Cargo would mean that a naive implementation of the profile option would cause recompiles between cargo build and cargo test for projects that specify panic = 'abort'. Is this acceptable? Should Cargo cache both copies of the crate?