New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: introduce new type var when expectation for ref pat is not ref #14872
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
May 22, 2023
@bors r+ |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2023
fix: introduce new type var when expectation for ref pat is not ref Fixes #14840 When we infer the type of ref patterns, its expected type may not be reference type: 1) expected type is an unresolved inference variable, or 2) expected type is erroneously other kind of type. In either case, we should produce a reference type with a new type variable rather than an error type so that we can continue inferring the inner patterns without further errors because of the (possible) type mismatch of this pattern.
bors died again? |
@bors r- |
@bors r+ |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2023
fix: introduce new type var when expectation for ref pat is not ref Fixes #14840 When we infer the type of ref patterns, its expected type may not be reference type: 1) expected type is an unresolved inference variable, or 2) expected type is erroneously other kind of type. In either case, we should produce a reference type with a new type variable rather than an error type so that we can continue inferring the inner patterns without further errors because of the (possible) type mismatch of this pattern.
@bors r- |
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This brings the pattern type mismatches on self down to zero 🎉 Maybe we want to keep that by some CI check? We already do |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #14840
When we infer the type of ref patterns, its expected type may not be reference type: 1) expected type is an unresolved inference variable, or 2) expected type is erroneously other kind of type. In either case, we should produce a reference type with a new type variable rather than an error type so that we can continue inferring the inner patterns without further errors because of the (possible) type mismatch of this pattern.