This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Rust should be well-equipped for writing robust, high-scale servers #10

Open
aturon opened this Issue Jan 31, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@aturon
Member

aturon commented Jan 31, 2017

Overview

The biggest area we've seen with interest in production Rust so far is the server, particularly in cases where high-scale performance, control, and/or reliability are paramount. At the moment, our ecosystem in this space is nascent, and production users are having to build a lot from scratch.

Of the specific domains we might target for having a more complete story, Rust on the server is the place with the clearest direction and momentum. In a year's time, it's within reach to drastically improve Rust's server ecosystem and the overall experience of writing server code. The relevant pieces here include foundations for async IO, language improvements for async code ergonomics, shared infrastructure for writing services (including abstractions for implementing protocols and middleware), and endless interfaces to existing services/protocols.

There are two reasons to focus on the robust, high-scale case. Most importantly, it's the place where Rust has the clearest value proposition relative to other languages, and hence the place where we're likeliest to achieve significant, quality production usage (as discussed earlier in the RFC). More generally, the overall server space is huge, so choosing a particular niche provides essential focus for our efforts.

Current status

As of 2017-06-06

Mid-way through the year we've got some excellent projects underway (linked below) and are starting to wind down a discussion on what blocks you today from using Rust on the server with the most requested items being documentation for futures/Tokio, async/await syntax, a "solid" HTTP library (e.g. stable, 1.0 quality, async, HTTP/2 support, etc), and database drivers (particularly async ones). This thread will likely help guide work for the next few months and possibly through to the end of the year.

Projects

Tokio projects:

Discussion

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alexcrichton

alexcrichton Jun 6, 2017

Member

I've updated the issue with links and some summaries from our recent users thread as well as some updates along some projects that have happened.

Member

alexcrichton commented Jun 6, 2017

I've updated the issue with links and some summaries from our recent users thread as well as some updates along some projects that have happened.

@sorenbs

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@sorenbs

sorenbs Feb 2, 2018

@alexcrichton Any chance you could add a new status update?

sorenbs commented Feb 2, 2018

@alexcrichton Any chance you could add a new status update?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.