Please sign in to comment.
Revise test slightly so that `dyn` in macro invocation *must* be pars…
…ed as keyword in test. Back-story: After reflection this morning, I realized that the previous form of this test would allow the macro invocation to treat the `dyn` input as a raw-identifier rather than a keyword, and since the input was discarded by that version of the macro, the test would pass despite the detail that the input `dyn` should not have been parsed as a raw-identifier. This revision fixes that oversight, by actually *using* the macro input to construct a `Box<dyn Trait>` type.
- Loading branch information...
Showing with 4 additions and 4 deletions.