Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upCan define a associated type more than once #23969
Comments
Kimundi
added
the
A-parser
label
Apr 2, 2015
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
triage: I-nominated |
rust-highfive
added
the
I-nominated
label
Apr 2, 2015
nikomatsakis
added
the
A-associated-items
label
Apr 2, 2015
nrc
added
A-associated-items
and removed
A-associated-items
A-parser
labels
Apr 2, 2015
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
classifying as just a bug. P-backcompat-lang, not 1.0 blocker. |
pnkfelix
added
P-backcompat-lang
and removed
I-nominated
labels
Apr 2, 2015
brson
added
P-medium
A-typesystem
and removed
P-backcompat-lang
labels
Apr 24, 2015
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Demoting this to P-medium. Somebody should get on it though! |
nham
pushed a commit
to nham/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2015
nham
pushed a commit
to nham/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2015
nham
pushed a commit
to nham/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2015
nham
referenced this issue
Jun 3, 2015
Merged
Detect duplicate implementations of assoc. types and constants. #25993
nham
pushed a commit
to nham/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2015
nham
pushed a commit
to nham/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 16, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2015
bors
closed this
in
#25993
Jul 17, 2015
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Kimundi commentedApr 2, 2015
This erroneously parses and compiles fine, the compiler seems to use the first definition of
Tyin the impl.This might have been introduced by #23265, ping @eddyb.