Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for `fundamental` feature #29635

Open
aturon opened this Issue Nov 5, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Nov 5, 2015

This feature flag, part of RFC 1023, is not intended to be stabilized as-is. But this issue tracks discussion about whether some external feature it needed. Perhaps there is a cleaner way to address the balance between negative reasoning and API evolution. See the RFC for details.

@steveklabnik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

steveklabnik commented Mar 8, 2017

Triage: no changes

@khuey

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

khuey commented Jun 22, 2017

See rust-lang-nursery/futures-rs#479 for an example of something this would solve.

@steveklabnik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

steveklabnik commented Mar 12, 2019

Triage: not aware of any change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.