New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic JIT testing #3328

Closed
brson opened this Issue Aug 31, 2012 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@brson
Contributor

brson commented Aug 31, 2012

We have JIT code now. It passes lots of tests, but we don't actually run them. Needs a bot.

@pnkfelix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnkfelix

pnkfelix May 6, 2013

Member

rusti uses the JIT, right? So regression+bot testing of rusti could help with this; see Issue #5469.

I'm assuming brson ideally wants unit tests for the JIT as well, but rusti testing alone might suffice for much of what we need.

Member

pnkfelix commented May 6, 2013

rusti uses the JIT, right? So regression+bot testing of rusti could help with this; see Issue #5469.

I'm assuming brson ideally wants unit tests for the JIT as well, but rusti testing alone might suffice for much of what we need.

@pnkfelix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnkfelix

pnkfelix May 6, 2013

Member

Nominating for maturity milestone 4: "well covered", since this is a measurement mechanism for evaluating the correctness of a library.

Member

pnkfelix commented May 6, 2013

Nominating for maturity milestone 4: "well covered", since this is a measurement mechanism for evaluating the correctness of a library.

@brson

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@brson

brson May 16, 2013

Contributor

compiletest does have a mode for testing the JIT now, but we never run it

Contributor

brson commented May 16, 2013

compiletest does have a mode for testing the JIT now, but we never run it

@graydon

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@graydon

graydon Jun 20, 2013

Contributor

accepted for well-covered milestone

Contributor

graydon commented Jun 20, 2013

accepted for well-covered milestone

@pnkfelix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnkfelix

pnkfelix Aug 14, 2013

Member

visiting for triage, email from 2013-08-05.

I considered adding E-needstest tag. But this isn't about adding more tests (that's how I read "it passes lots of test"), its instead about adding either a dedicated bot, or incorporating the tests into some existing test suite?

Member

pnkfelix commented Aug 14, 2013

visiting for triage, email from 2013-08-05.

I considered adding E-needstest tag. But this isn't about adding more tests (that's how I read "it passes lots of test"), its instead about adding either a dedicated bot, or incorporating the tests into some existing test suite?

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@alexcrichton

alexcrichton Dec 17, 2013

Member

Closing, the JIT has been removed.

Member

alexcrichton commented Dec 17, 2013

Closing, the JIT has been removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment