Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support different backend for testing #43381

Closed
farodin91 opened this Issue Jul 21, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@farodin91
Copy link

farodin91 commented Jul 21, 2017

I like how the test works in rust, but I want to integrate them into intellij-rust/intellij-rust#1485. Therefore it would be cool to get test results in a different format like JSON.

This could be done by each test returns a single line JSON object and a single line conclusion at the end.

@mkaput

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

mkaput commented Jul 21, 2017

For IntelliJ Rust, actually TeamCity Service Messages would be perfect :)

@gilescope

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

gilescope commented Sep 16, 2017

Yep, agreed. I like how NUnit3 does it. They have a '-teamcity' command line flag that turns on the service messages. This would make integration with enterprise teamcity instances a doddle. Should be really quite easy functionallity to add and for the utility it brings it seems a no-brainer for me. (I suspect TeamCity isn't the only CI that interprets the TeamCity Service Messages).

@gilescope

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

gilescope commented Sep 19, 2017

Should have a PR ready for review in a few days to support the TeamCity service messages. Need to test it with TeamCity first and ensure there's tests around it.

@dtolnay

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Nov 19, 2017

I would love to support this but as discussed in #44813 let's track this as part of rust-lang/rfcs#816.

@dtolnay dtolnay closed this Nov 19, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.