Skip to content

/rust

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for RFC 2294, "if let guard" #51114

Open
Centril opened this Issue May 27, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
B-RFC-approved C-tracking-issue T-lang
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@Centril @imjacobclark
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented May 27, 2018

This is a tracking issue for the RFC "if let guard" (rust-lang/rfcs#2294).

Steps:

Unresolved questions:

@Centril Centril added B-RFC-approved T-lang C-tracking-issue labels May 27, 2018

@Centril Centril referenced this issue May 27, 2018

Merged

propose if let guard #2294

@F001 F001 referenced this issue Aug 30, 2018

Merged

refactor match guard #53815

bors added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2018

@bors
Auto merge of #53815 - F001:if-let-guard, r=petrochenkov 
refactor match guard

This is the first step to implement RFC 2294: if-let-guard. Tracking issue: #51114

The second step should be introducing another variant `IfLet` in the Guard enum. I separated them into 2 PRs for the convenience of reviewers.

r? @petrochenkov
Loading status checks…
bcd0c64

bors added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2018

@bors
Auto merge of #53815 - F001:if-let-guard, r=petrochenkov 
refactor match guard

This is the first step to implement RFC 2294: if-let-guard. Tracking issue: #51114

The second step should be introducing another variant `IfLet` in the Guard enum. I separated them into 2 PRs for the convenience of reviewers.

r? @petrochenkov
Loading status checks…
28bcffe
@imjacobclark

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

imjacobclark commented Jan 9, 2019

👋 After a conversation about this change with @varkor I'm starting to take a look at this with a view to implementing it!

@pnkfelix pnkfelix referenced this issue Mar 28, 2019

Open

NLL: complete transition from migrate to full NLL #57895

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.