From 70a357a4c68b3a0c1a457d7a0fa06c295587bbdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:04:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] prefer repeat_n() over repeat().take()

---
 compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs
index 785978b4d7111..630e99ad4c74e 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
             .compute_size_in_bytes(layout.size, count)
             .ok_or_else(|| err_ub_custom!(fluent::const_eval_size_overflow, name = name))?;
 
-        let bytes = std::iter::repeat(byte).take(len.bytes_usize());
+        let bytes = std::iter::repeat_n(byte, len.bytes_usize());
         self.write_bytes_ptr(dst, bytes)
     }