Skip to content

Conversation

@arayikhalatyan
Copy link

This pull request adds OpenVM as a new target for Rust. The riscv32im-unknown-openvm-elf target runs inside a virtual machine with full support for the RV32IM ISA. The target includes limited support for std through customizable non-standard RISC-V instruction set extensions which are configurable in the OpenVM framework. While std library support is currently limited (see book for details), it is important to have this functionality for downstream users to compile existing crates that are not no_std but in practice require limited OS functionality. Moreover, additional support for more std features is expected and can be customizable through extensions of the VM.

We have chosen the -unknown-openvm-elf naming policy in accordance with the discussion in #135376 (comment)

Further details may be found in the target description doc.

Tier 3 target policy:

Here is a copy of the tier 3 target policy:

Tier 3 target policy:
At this tier, the Rust project provides no official support for a target, so we
place minimal requirements on the introduction of targets.
A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the
compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge
broader compiler team consensus via a [Major Change Proposal (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html).
A proposed target or target-specific patch that substantially changes code
shared with other targets (not just target-specific code) must be reviewed and
approved by the appropriate team for that shared code before acceptance.

  • A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
    maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
    (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)

The maintainers are named in the target description file

  • Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
    target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
    name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
    naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
    (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
    diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
    once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
    even for a tier 3 target.
  • Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
    absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
    the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
    beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
    disambiguate it.
  • If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
    Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.

We understand. While the target shares similarities to riscv32im-risc0-zkvm-elf, we choose the riscv32im-unknown-openvm-elf naming in accordance with the discussion in #135376 (comment)

  • Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
    create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
    Rust developers or users.

    • The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.

We understand and will not introduce incompatibilities.

  • Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

We understand. The code added to the Rust repository is under MIT OR Apache-2.0 license.

  • The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
    host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
    on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
    applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
    new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the
    rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
    or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
    user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
    subject to any new license requirements.

We understand. The runtime libraries and the execution environment and software associated with this environment uses MIT OR Apache-2.0 so this should not be an issue.

  • Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
    code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
    from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
    Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
    libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
    built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
    generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
    such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may
    depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
    but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
    optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
    Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
    scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.

We understand. All OpenVM crates that may be required for correct linking are also licensed under MIT OR Apache-2.0 license.

  • "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
    legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure
    requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
    (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
    requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
    Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
    for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
    adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
    developers or users.

There are no such terms present

  • Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
    binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
    Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
    employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
    decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
    decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
    participate in discussions.

We understand.

  • This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
    cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
    maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
    developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
    face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
    exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
    subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.

We understand.

  • Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
    as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets
    that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an
    operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
    may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
    appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
    challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
    avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
    target not implementing those portions.

The target implements core and alloc. Support for std is limited, with some functionality stubbed out. The target provides std support through custom RISC-V instruction set extensions (see book for details) and is not meant to provide a full OS. However std support is still important for downstream users of the target due to the need to compile existing crates that are not no_std but in practice require limited OS functionality. Furthermore, due to the customizable framework of the target virtual machines, more comprehensive std support may be implemented with extensions in the future.

  • The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
    to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
    supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
    documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
    using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.

See file target description file

  • Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
    other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
    do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
    block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
    notifications (via any medium, including via @) to a PR author or others
    involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
    such messages.

We understand.

  • Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
    an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
    reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
    generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
    such notifications.

We understand.

  • Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
    or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
    approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
    target.

    • In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
      such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
      introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
      target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
      appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.

We understand.

Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)

ELF binaries for the target can be generated using the LLVM backend.

If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers
no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and
has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality
of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed
to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously
worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.

We understand.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2025

The Miri subtree was changed

cc @rust-lang/miri

Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support

cc @Noratrieb

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 9, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2025

r? @ChrisDenton

rustbot has assigned @ChrisDenton.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 9, 2025

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • There are issue links (such as #123) in the commit messages of the following commits.
    Please move them to the PR description, to avoid spamming the issues with references to the commit, and so this bot can automatically canonicalize them to avoid issues with subtree.

@arayikhalatyan
Copy link
Author

r? compiler

@rustbot rustbot assigned mati865 and unassigned ChrisDenton Dec 9, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@RalfJung RalfJung added the needs-mcp This change is large enough that it needs a major change proposal before starting work. label Dec 9, 2025
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Dec 9, 2025

New targets need an MCP to be filed at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues. I don't think that has happened yet for this one?

The MCP should explain what exactly is meant by "limited" std support. Which operations work, which don't? We want to avoid repeating the mistake that is wasm32-unk-unk where hardly anything in std works -- that target should have been no_std.

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-1 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
---- [ui] tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs stdout ----
Saved the actual stderr to `/checkout/obj/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features/cfg-crate-features.stderr`
diff of stderr:

24 LL | #![cfg(not(target(os = "does_not_exist")))]
25    |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
26    |
-    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `openvm`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, and `solaris` and 14 more
+    = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `openvm`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, and `solaris` and 15 more
28    = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
29    = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
30 


The actual stderr differed from the expected stderr
To update references, rerun the tests and pass the `--bless` flag
To only update this specific test, also pass `--test-args check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs`

error: 1 errors occurred comparing output.
status: exit status: 1
command: env -u RUSTC_LOG_COLOR RUSTC_ICE="0" RUST_BACKTRACE="short" "/checkout/obj/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc" "/checkout/tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs" "-Zthreads=1" "-Zsimulate-remapped-rust-src-base=/rustc/FAKE_PREFIX" "-Ztranslate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/cargo" "-Z" "ignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks=/checkout/vendor" "--sysroot" "/checkout/obj/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2" "--target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--check-cfg" "cfg(test,FALSE)" "--error-format" "json" "--json" "future-incompat" "-Ccodegen-units=1" "-Zui-testing" "-Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=no" "-Zwrite-long-types-to-disk=no" "-Cstrip=debuginfo" "--emit" "metadata" "-C" "prefer-dynamic" "--out-dir" "/checkout/obj/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features" "-A" "unused" "-W" "unused_attributes" "-A" "internal_features" "-A" "unused_parens" "-A" "unused_braces" "-Crpath" "-Cdebuginfo=0" "-Lnative=/checkout/obj/build/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/rust-test-helpers"
stdout: none
--- stderr -------------------------------
error[E0658]: `cfg(version)` is experimental and subject to change
##[error]  --> /checkout/tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs:4:8
   |
LL | #![cfg(version("1.0"))]
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: see issue #64796 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64796> for more information
   = help: add `#![feature(cfg_version)]` to the crate attributes to enable
   = note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date

error[E0658]: compact `cfg(target(..))` is experimental and subject to change
##[error]  --> /checkout/tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs:9:12
   |
LL | #![cfg(not(target(os = "does_not_exist")))]
   |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: see issue #96901 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96901> for more information
   = help: add `#![feature(cfg_target_compact)]` to the crate attributes to enable
   = note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `does_not_exist`
##[warning]  --> /checkout/tests/ui/check-cfg/cfg-crate-features.rs:9:19
   |
LL | #![cfg(not(target(os = "does_not_exist")))]
   |                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: expected values for `target_os` are: `aix`, `amdhsa`, `android`, `cuda`, `cygwin`, `dragonfly`, `emscripten`, `espidf`, `freebsd`, `fuchsia`, `haiku`, `helenos`, `hermit`, `horizon`, `hurd`, `illumos`, `ios`, `l4re`, `linux`, `lynxos178`, `macos`, `managarm`, `motor`, `netbsd`, `none`, `nto`, `nuttx`, `openbsd`, `openvm`, `psp`, `psx`, `qurt`, `redox`, `rtems`, and `solaris` and 15 more
   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
   = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors; 1 warning emitted

@mati865
Copy link
Member

mati865 commented Dec 9, 2025

MCP is optional for tier 3 targets:

A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge broader compiler team consensus via a Major Change Proposal (MCP).

IIRC, it has changed this year.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Dec 9, 2025

Ah, I see.

The comment about "limited" std support stands though -- please summarize what exactly that means in terms of which operations are available and which are missing. In particular, are there any operations that just panic because they cannot return a Result? That would be problematic and an indication that maybe we should make this a no_std target instead.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Dec 9, 2025

MCP is optional for tier 3 targets:

A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge broader compiler team consensus via a Major Change Proposal (MCP).

IIRC, it has changed this year.

Yes, the intention is that if it's non-controversial, a PR suffices, but the reviewer can elect to request a MCP esp. if the proposed target has quirks ™️ (such as limited std support, or discuss things about a target that possibly can never progress past Tier 3 for whatever reason).

@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member

I believe libs have previously said that they would want new tier 2 std targets to at least support std::time::Instant. However, tier 3 targets have been given some leeway here.

cc @rust-lang/libs-api @rust-lang/libs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-mcp This change is large enough that it needs a major change proposal before starting work. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants