Skip to content

normalize instead of evaluating type const patterns#157660

Open
Shourya742 wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
Shourya742:2026-06-08-add-type-const-evaluation
Open

normalize instead of evaluating type const patterns#157660
Shourya742 wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
Shourya742:2026-06-08-add-type-const-evaluation

Conversation

@Shourya742

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rustbot

rustbot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Some changes occurred in match checking

cc @Nadrieril

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 9, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

BoxyUwU is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

@Shourya742 Shourya742 force-pushed the 2026-06-08-add-type-const-evaluation branch from b038c4a to 8580658 Compare June 9, 2026 11:02
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Shourya742 Shourya742 force-pushed the 2026-06-08-add-type-const-evaluation branch from 8580658 to 6afe36f Compare June 9, 2026 13:15
@rustbot

rustbot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Work Item]: normalize instead of evaluating type const patterns

4 participants