Skip to content

/rust

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jemalloc to 4.0.0 and LLVM to 3.7 #28173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 8, 2015

Conversation

Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@brson brson

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
6 participants
@alexcrichton @rust-highfive @brson @bors @sfackler @huonw
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Sep 2, 2015

This updates the jemalloc and LLVM submodules to the recently released 4.0.0 and 3.7 versions. There's no breakage on the LLVM side of things because we had already been tracking the 3.7 release branch for awhile and no breakage was introduced, and jemalloc apparently is stable enough that nothing broke!
@alexcrichton
Update to LLVM 3.7 
This is a rebase of our few small patches on top of the release of LLVM 3.7,
picking up those last few bug fixes on the way up to 3.7!
Loading status checks…
5cb6b3e

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned huonw Sep 2, 2015

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Sep 2, 2015

r? @brson

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned brson and unassigned huonw Sep 2, 2015

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Collaborator

rust-highfive commented Sep 2, 2015

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)
@brson

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Sep 2, 2015

@bors r+
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 2, 2015

📌 Commit 0e2ebc2 has been approved by brson
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

⌛️ Testing commit 0e2ebc2 with merge 98f00a8...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2015

@bors
Auto merge of #28173 - alexcrichton:llvm-37, r=brson 
This updates the jemalloc and LLVM submodules to the recently released 4.0.0 and 3.7 versions. There's no breakage on the LLVM side of things because we had already been tracking the 3.7 release branch for awhile and no breakage was introduced, and jemalloc apparently is stable enough that nothing broke!
98f00a8
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t
@sfackler

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

sfackler commented Sep 3, 2015

@bors retry
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

⌛️ Testing commit 0e2ebc2 with merge 2187a0c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2015

@bors
Auto merge of #28173 - alexcrichton:llvm-37, r=brson 
This updates the jemalloc and LLVM submodules to the recently released 4.0.0 and 3.7 versions. There's no breakage on the LLVM side of things because we had already been tracking the 3.7 release branch for awhile and no breakage was introduced, and jemalloc apparently is stable enough that nothing broke!
2187a0c
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-gnu-32-opt

@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the alexcrichton:llvm-37 branch from 0e2ebc2 to 5cb6b3e Sep 8, 2015

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Sep 8, 2015

@bors: r=brson 5cb6b3e
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 8, 2015

⌛️ Testing commit 5cb6b3e with merge 192c375...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2015

@bors
Auto merge of #28173 - alexcrichton:llvm-37, r=brson 
This updates the jemalloc and LLVM submodules to the recently released 4.0.0 and 3.7 versions. There's no breakage on the LLVM side of things because we had already been tracking the 3.7 release branch for awhile and no breakage was introduced, and jemalloc apparently is stable enough that nothing broke!
Loading status checks…
192c375
@bors

@bors bors merged commit 5cb6b3e into rust-lang:master Sep 8, 2015
2 checks passed

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details

@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the alexcrichton:llvm-37 branch Sep 8, 2015

@alexcrichton

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Sep 8, 2015

Ah I forgot to update the title, but due to the Windows failures I wanted to land the LLVM update separately from the jemalloc update, so this just landed LLVM 3.7, not jemalloc 4.0.0

@alexcrichton alexcrichton referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2015

Closed

Update jemalloc to 4.0.0 #28304

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2015

@bors
Auto merge of #28304 - alexcrichton:jemalloc-4, r=brson 
Haven't updated jemalloc in awhile and they just released a new version, and
this also includes the upstream changes to support platforms like openbsd and
bitrig.

Follow up to #28173 which includes jemalloc (to debug on the windows builders)
a52f8bb

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2015

@bors
Auto merge of #28304 - alexcrichton:jemalloc-4, r=brson 
Haven't updated jemalloc in awhile and they just released a new version, and
this also includes the upstream changes to support platforms like openbsd and
bitrig.

Follow up to #28173 which includes jemalloc (to debug on the windows builders)
001dbf5

@alexcrichton alexcrichton referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2015

Closed

Lazy lock may be broken on Windows? #310

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.