Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upMove some #[no_std] info to stable book. #30903
Conversation
rust-highfive
assigned
alexcrichton
Jan 14, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
alexcrichton
added
the
beta-nominated
label
Jan 14, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors: rollup |
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
brson
added
the
beta-accepted
label
Jan 14, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Accepted per IRC. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
bors
merged commit 0394418
into
rust-lang:master
Jan 15, 2016
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr
The Travis CI build passed
Details
brson
removed
the
beta-nominated
label
Jan 19, 2016
steveklabnik
deleted the
steveklabnik:no_std_stable
branch
Jun 19, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
steveklabnik commentedJan 14, 2016
This feature is partially stabilized, so describe each part in the appropriate place.
r? @alexcrichton @brson
It would be nice to backport this to beta, since this is the first release where this is true. I try really hard to not do doc backports, but this isn't very large, and might be worth making an exception, I dunno.