Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Bump system LLVM version to 7 #55176

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

glandium
Copy link
Contributor

My immediate goal with this PR is to see if the change works on Travis. There is much discussion to have related to system LLVM, Travis, and the minimum supported version of system LLVM, and I'm not sure this is the right avenue. I'll probably post something on internals.rust-lang.org.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 18, 2018
@glandium
Copy link
Contributor Author

Started thread: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rust-vs-llvm/8604

Don't merge.

@kennytm kennytm added S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 19, 2018
@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis changed the title Bump system LLVM version to 7 [WIP] Bump system LLVM version to 7 Oct 22, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging as [WIP] to prevent accidental merging =)

@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 17, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #56642) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Jan 26, 2019

It does not appear that there is any more discussion on the linked thread. There doesn’t appear to be any sort of consensus...

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Feb 10, 2019

@glandium is this PR still necessary ?

@glandium
Copy link
Contributor Author

Probably not.

@glandium glandium closed this Feb 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants