Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak RawVec::reserve{,_exact}. #75129

Closed

Conversation

nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ghost

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2020

⌛ Trying commit 6fd1a56 with merge 8bb4a7a688108af7cea8b3a844f9b02fa1aca0df...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 4, 2020

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions, checks-azure
Build commit: 8bb4a7a688108af7cea8b3a844f9b02fa1aca0df (8bb4a7a688108af7cea8b3a844f9b02fa1aca0df)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 8bb4a7a688108af7cea8b3a844f9b02fa1aca0df with parent 1d601d6, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (8bb4a7a688108af7cea8b3a844f9b02fa1aca0df): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never

@mati865
Copy link
Contributor

mati865 commented Aug 4, 2020

Slightly positive task-clock and wall-time.

@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eh, it's a wash.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants