Conversation
Benchmark resultsInstruction countsSignificant differencesClick to expand
Other differencesClick to expand
Wall-timeSignificant differencesThere are no significant wall-time differences Other differencesClick to expand
Additional informationCheckout details:
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2126 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.66% 94.87% +0.21%
==========================================
Files 102 102
Lines 23450 24263 +813
==========================================
+ Hits 22198 23019 +821
+ Misses 1252 1244 -8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fae6fa9 to
b65fb44
Compare
|
Thanks for doing this, happy to do the legwork on the remaining samples to eliminate docopt altogether after this is finished. |
cc3fcdd to
64733fb
Compare
|
Separate from the docopt -> clap change, how do folks feel about the "mio" part of the example names? I've heard from at least one person looking for something sort of like a It feels a little bit like the MIO part is an implementation detail, and perhaps not the "main draw" of the examples. WDYT? |
Seems fair. Since we have the |
I'm a little bit torn on that direction. If we made that change, would there be an argument the examples should live in the Edit; also don't want to derail this PR too much. Maybe best to file a separate issue? |
You were the one arguing that these examples are effectively providing a CLI for rustls, which makes sense to me. I think any value from sitting between the simple examples and deferring to Tokio for I/O is extremely niche. But as discussed recently, I'm kind of down on having many examples...
Yeah, wasn't going to pick it up for this PR. |
Not sure how best to test that this works...
I can take care of the other examples too, but figured it'd be good to get feedback on one first.