Skip to content

Conversation

@rvarago
Copy link
Owner

@rvarago rvarago commented Jan 29, 2025

No description provided.

@rvarago rvarago force-pushed the feat/fold-returntype-implicit-conv branch from 7a2686d to 6a817df Compare January 29, 2025 16:09
@rvarago
Copy link
Owner Author

rvarago commented Jan 29, 2025

Q: Do we want implicit conversions?

They may be convenient (and perhaps expected from an ecosystems-standpoint), but can be surprising/dangerous...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants