Permalink
Commits on May 12, 2011
  1. LOFL!

    wayneeseguin committed May 12, 2011
  2. Merge pull request #266 from MagLev/MagLev-25838

    Update to MagLev-25838
    wayneeseguin committed May 12, 2011
Commits on May 11, 2011
  1. Switch to antialias.

    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  2. Corrected ordering.

    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  3. Release 1.6.7

    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  4. Level the playing field.

    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  5. Merge pull request #265 from gabebw/dollar-dollar

    Use cp -f and rm -f when dealing with /tmp/$$
    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  6. Release 1.6.6

    wayneeseguin committed May 11, 2011
  7. Updated to MagLev-25838

    Monty Williams committed May 11, 2011
Commits on May 10, 2011
  1. Only if prefix is nonempty.

    wayneeseguin committed May 10, 2011
Commits on May 7, 2011
  1. Merge pull request #264 from derekprior/help-updates

    Update help for `rvm rubygems`
    wayneeseguin committed May 7, 2011
Commits on May 6, 2011
  1. set -fu

    wayneeseguin committed May 6, 2011
  2. Merge pull request #263 from meineerde/setup_rvm_group_users-with-no-…

    …users
    
    Fix setup_rvm_group_users for the case when there are no additional users
    wayneeseguin committed May 6, 2011
  3. Fix setup_rvm_group_users for the case when there are no additional u…

    …sers.
    
    The erroneous behavior was the output of
    Ensuring '' is in group 'rvm'
    Adding user '' to group 'rvm'
    usermod: user '' does not exist
    meineerde committed May 6, 2011
Commits on May 5, 2011
  1. Tweaked recursive copy.

    wayneeseguin committed May 5, 2011
  2. handle get specially.

    wayneeseguin committed May 5, 2011
  3. resolution

    wayneeseguin committed May 5, 2011
  4. s/aptitude/apt-get/g

    Many users of Debian certainly and probably other Debian-derived distros prefer 'apt-get' to 'aptitude'. For whatever reasons [Ubuntu has actually stopped shipping with 'aptitude' by default](http://www.webupd8.org/2010/06/aptitude-removed-from-ubuntu-1010.html). Without debating the technical merits of either tool, I would say this:
    
    + An etiquette argument: 'apt-get' works perfectly well to install packages from the command line. If 'apt-get' is found, there's no reason not to use it. There's certainly no reason to 'install' it on Ubuntu or any machine where it's not even present. Choosing a person's package manager for them is pretty much like dancing with someone's date: it's not done.
    + A more detailed but important reason: 'apt-get' and 'aptitude' now *both* support autoremoval of packages that were installed as dependencies of packages that are no longer installed. However, aptitude will attempt to immediately remove all those items, while 'apt-get' will only prompt you to do so. This is a larger issue+ A more detailed but important reason: 'apt-get' and 'aptitude' now *both* support autoremoval of packages that were installed as dependencies of packages that are no longer installed. However, aptitude will attempt to immediately remove all those items, while 'apt-get' will only prompt you to do so. This is a larger issue+ A morest](+ A more detailed but important reason: 'apt-get' and 'aptitude' now *both* support autoremoval of packages that were installed as dependencies of packages that are no longer installed. However, aptitude will attempt to immediately remove all those items, while 'apt-get' will only prompt you to do so. This is a larger issue+ A more detailed but important ret e
    wayneeseguin committed May 5, 2011
Commits on May 4, 2011
  1. Merge pull request #259 from matschaffer/patch-1

    Ensure aptitude is installed.
    wayneeseguin committed May 4, 2011
  2. More set -u fun.

    wayneeseguin committed May 4, 2011