RVM assumes all Ubuntu installs are x86 in binary search #1214

Closed
jamesotron opened this Issue Oct 10, 2012 · 8 comments

Projects

None yet

3 participants

@jamesotron
Contributor

Running rvm install 1.9.3 on my G4 cube creates the following output:

[09:21][root@cube]~# uname -a
Linux cube.harton.co.nz 3.2.0-29-powerpc-smp #46-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 27 17:19:05 UTC 2012 ppc ppc ppc GNU/Linux
[09:21][root@cube]~# rvm install 1.9.3
No binary rubies available for: ubuntu/12.04/i386/ruby-1.9.3-p194.
@mpapis mpapis was assigned Oct 10, 2012
@mpapis mpapis closed this in f067e6e Oct 18, 2012
@mpapis
Member
mpapis commented Oct 18, 2012

planned for 1.16.15

@mpapis mpapis reopened this Oct 18, 2012
@mpapis mpapis closed this in 2ba2ca4 Oct 18, 2012
@madmanmax

I've just installed RVM and it contains this fix but I still have this issue. Happens on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS with RVM: rvm 1.16.15 (stable)

Running: rvm reinstall all --force I get this:

No binary rubies available for: ubuntu/12.04/i686/ruby-1.9.3-p286.
Continuing with compilation. Please read 'rvm mount' to get more information on binary rubies.
No binary rubies available for: ubuntu/12.04/i686/ruby-1.8.7-p371.
Continuing with compilation. Please read 'rvm mount' to get more information on binary rubies.
@mpapis
Member
mpapis commented Oct 19, 2012

can you provide output of:

uname -m
@mpapis mpapis reopened this Oct 19, 2012
@madmanmax

Sure, it's: i686

@mpapis
Member
mpapis commented Oct 19, 2012

@madmanmax your problem is not related to this issue, please open two new issues:

  1. to create binary ruby for ubuntu/12.04/i686/ruby-1.9.3-p286
  2. to fix detecting 32bit ubuntu, include output of uname -m | awk '{if($0~"^i[[:digit:]]86") print "i386"; else print;}'
@mpapis mpapis closed this Oct 19, 2012
@madmanmax

OK, I've followed your instructions and opened 2 new issues: #1245 and #1246.

@mpapis
Member
mpapis commented Oct 19, 2012

@madmanmax thank you!

@madmanmax

@mpapis thank you as well for the quick replies :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment