-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 692
some type annotations in comp.py #40959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit bd875bb; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
dcoudert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
otherwise, LGTM.
dcoudert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
|
setting back to positive after trivial merge |
sagemathgh-40959: some type annotations in comp.py mostly to remember that `.items` defined there is a generator, as it should ### 📝 Checklist - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. URL: sagemath#40959 Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton Reviewer(s): David Coudert, Frédéric Chapoton
sagemathgh-40959: some type annotations in comp.py mostly to remember that `.items` defined there is a generator, as it should ### 📝 Checklist - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. URL: sagemath#40959 Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton Reviewer(s): David Coudert, Frédéric Chapoton
mostly to remember that
.itemsdefined there is a generator, as it should📝 Checklist