rename shadow to linux_shadow for consistency#53296
Closed
gtmanfred wants to merge 5 commits into
Closed
Conversation
And easy documentation purposes.
rares-pop
approved these changes
May 29, 2019
waynew
approved these changes
Sep 18, 2019
This was referenced Jan 14, 2020
ghost
requested a review
from 
Contributor
|
This needs to go to the |
Contributor
|
Hi, @gtmanfred. This still needs to go into the master branch. Thank you for the tests and the PR! |
Contributor
|
@cmcmarrow I believe this PR can be closed, because it is already included in #55914 that was merged a while ago. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Right now, the docs for shadow.rst just talk about there being a shadow module, but it is impossible to see the shadow docs for linux. This moves the linux module to linux_shadow.py and links them
Commits signed with GPG?
Yes