Conversation
As mentioned, there aren't any tests of recurse_types. Are there any suggestions of how to handle this? |
|
Hey all. Happy to look into tests for this, if there is a recommendation on what they should look like. |
|
@mchugh19 Apologies for the delay in responding. We did have some existing tests that were testing including two conflicting recurse options, in the unit test for |
…le we are passing in, this will be different depending on platform.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #54976 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 39.36% 39.36%
=======================================
Files 1495 1495
Lines 262788 262788
Branches 55570 55570
=======================================
Hits 103416 103416
Misses 147571 147571
Partials 11801 11801
|
1 similar comment
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #54976 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 39.36% 39.36%
=======================================
Files 1495 1495
Lines 262788 262788
Branches 55570 55570
=======================================
Hits 103416 103416
Misses 147571 147571
Partials 11801 11801
|
…e the tests pass on Windows. Adding additional patches to reset the mock of file.check_perms back to what is expected since the ret is changed when the module is run.
|
Support output like: where changes is expected to remain a dictionary as later operation will continue to update it. |
|
re-run pr-pre-commit |
|
re-run pr-windows2019-py3 |
What does this PR do?
Port of develop merged #49201 to master
Tests written?
No - There don't seem to be any tests of recurse_types