-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Btrfs and XFS as supported fstypes #55209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Both filesystem types are supported by parted and mkfs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @brejoc thanks for the PR! Looks great!
Hey @brejoc looks like there's a conflict - could you take a look at that? Thanks! |
This PR is passing. The pending CentOS 8 build is an artifact of a bad Jenkins job. |
Oh, dam. There's conflicts. |
Conflicts resolved on the GH UI. |
Sorry guys, I was on vacation. And thanks for solving the conflict. I've just merged master into this branch again, to get the latest changes. |
Okay, I think this doesn't look bad. I don't know where that failure on ci/py2/amazon1 is coming from. The tests seem to have passed: |
Merged master again. Is there anything that prevents us from merging this? |
Changes are now blacked. |
What does this PR do?
Btrfs and XFS are supported by parted and mkfs. Adding them to the list.
This PR replaces #53126
Previous Behavior
btrfs and xfs where not supported for parted and mkfs.xxx.
New Behavior
btrfs and xfs are now supported.
Tests written?
Yes
Commits signed with GPG?
Yes