-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
#58747: Request addition of --addtag #58748
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi there! Welcome to the Salt Community! Thank you for making your first contribution. We have a lengthy process for issues and PRs. Someone from the Core Team will follow up as soon as possible. In the meantime, here’s some information that may help as you continue your Salt journey.
There are lots of ways to get involved in our community. Every month, there are around a dozen opportunities to meet with other contributors and the Salt Core team and collaborate in real time. The best way to keep track is by subscribing to the Salt Community Events Calendar. |
|
Hey @me-coder thanks for the PR! I've been OOO for a bit and am just catching up, apologies for the wait! I'll be reviewing this PR as soon as I can, thanks for your patience! |
waynew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! This definitely needs a changelog entry entry, at least.
I have checked the manpage for vgcreate and verified that addtag is valid option. I wonder if we should go ahead and add other options, though 🤔
Hello @waynew, I've not considered the other parameters, viz.:
Reason for that being my lack of expertise in that area and not able to test these. I've tested Let me know how you typically handle such situations and I'll be happy to help. |
decb110 to
bc54744
Compare
|
@waynew Also, I would appreciate some help with the failed CI tasks/stages. |
saltstack#58747: Request addition of --addtag as valid kwarg to linux_lvm module Signed-off-by: Yashodhan Pise <yashodhan.pise@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Yashodhan Pise <yashodhan.pise@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Yashodhan Pise <yashodhan.pise@seagate.com>
waynew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typically we would require tests, but here you're not actually adding any behavior, just entries to a list of valid entries. I've verified that these are valid options, so aside from a test that makes a VM and tries these commands I can't really think of a useful way to test. There's assert these_values == other_values, but that's not very meaningful.
|
I'm not sure what's up with that pycryptodome failure, though... |
|
re-run ubuntu1604-py3-pycryptodome-pytest |
|
Congratulations on your first PR being merged! 🎉 |
#58747: Request addition of --addtag as valid kwarg to linux_lvm module
What does this PR do?
Addresses #58747
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
Fixes: added new valid argument to vgcreate method of salt module: linux_lvm
Previous Behavior
The support for --addtag was missing.
New Behavior
The vgcreate method would support valid --addtag argument.
Merge requirements satisfied?
[NOTICE] Bug fixes or features added to Salt require tests.
Docs
Changelog - https://docs.saltstack.com/en/master/topics/development/changelog.html
Commits signed with GPG?
No
Please review Salt's Contributing Guide for best practices.
See GitHub's page on GPG signing for more information about signing commits with GPG.